PortfoliosLab logo
RFDA vs. AGG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RFDA and AGG is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

RFDA vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

RFDA:

6.84%

AGG:

5.37%

Max Drawdown

RFDA:

-0.49%

AGG:

-18.43%

Current Drawdown

RFDA:

0.00%

AGG:

-6.93%

Returns By Period


RFDA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AGG

YTD

2.20%

1M

1.07%

6M

1.18%

1Y

5.50%

5Y*

-0.78%

10Y*

1.51%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFDA vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.05% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RFDA vs. AGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RFDA is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RFDA is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RFDA is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RFDA is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RFDA is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RFDA is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGG is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGG is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGG is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGG is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGG is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGG is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RFDA vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

RFDA vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than AGG's 3.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.82%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.96%2.32%2.39%2.45%2.40%

Drawdowns

RFDA vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum AGG drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and AGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

RFDA vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...