PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFDA vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RFDA vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RFDA vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
-1.05%16.42%20.12%16.98%-8.58%25.94%11.26%27.15%-9.27%19.86%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
8.61%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 8.61% return.


RFDA

1D
1.86%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
0.65%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*

IAU

1D
3.80%
1M
-11.01%
YTD
8.61%
6M
21.15%
1Y
49.53%
3Y*
33.12%
5Y*
21.78%
10Y*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFDA vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RFDA vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFDA vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFDAIAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

1.80

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

2.24

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.69

-1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.46

9.97

-1.51

RFDA vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDA and IAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFDAIAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.80

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

1.24

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.64

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between RFDA and IAU is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RFDA vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
1.99%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RFDA vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and IAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RFDAIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.60%

-45.14%

+10.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-19.18%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-20.93%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

-13.20%

+9.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-15.98%

+12.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

5.18%

-2.69%

Volatility

RFDA vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is 4.32%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that RFDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RFDAIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

11.02%

-6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

24.11%

-15.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

27.62%

-9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

17.69%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

15.82%

+1.11%