FLQL vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLQL (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FLQL is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLQL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

FLQL vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.

FLQL

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 12.66%
• 6M: 12.54%
• 1Y: 29.48%
• 3Y*: 23.56%
• 5Y*: 14.70%
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -5.29%
• 1M: 25.28%
• YTD: 79.03%
• 6M: 68.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQL vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	12.66%	1.45%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	79.03%	-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and MEME is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.60

FLQL vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLQL	MEME
Technology	34.3%	58.8%
Communication Services	12.2%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	-
Healthcare	10.5%	5.4%
Industrials	10.0%	29.9%
Financial Services	9.9%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	4.6%
Utilities	1.6%	10.7%
Energy	1.0%	4.8%

Return for Risk

FLQL vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL

FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 71
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLQL	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.42	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLQL	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	0.28	+0.58

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLQL	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-48.78%	+15.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-5.93%	+5.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.04%	-29.90%	+25.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLQL	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.85%	74.19%	-61.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.12%	74.19%	-58.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	74.19%	-56.69%

FLQL vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLQL vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	1.01%	1.10%	1.13%	1.50%	2.07%	1.81%	1.99%	1.78%	1.82%	1.22%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLQL and MEME in my portfolio?

FLQL and MEME have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLQL or MEME?

On fees, FLQL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLQL or MEME?

FLQL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLQL or MEME?

FLQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between FLQL and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLQL and 0.69% for MEME.