FLQL vs. FLCH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).

FLQL and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLQL is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the LibertyQ U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2017. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both FLQL and FLCH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FLQL vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLQL vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	-2.22%	19.64%	24.33%	23.58%	-14.83%	26.58%	10.67%	29.09%	-2.79%	5.73%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-5.92%	32.55%	18.00%	-11.21%	-22.74%	-20.87%	30.09%	24.32%	-19.52%	0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLQL achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -5.92% return.

FLQL

• 1D: 3.25%
• 1M: -4.91%
• YTD: -2.22%
• 6M: -0.56%
• 1Y: 21.26%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: —

FLCH

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -5.53%
• YTD: -5.92%
• 6M: -12.58%
• 1Y: 7.42%
• 3Y*: 7.50%
• 5Y*: -4.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLQL vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLQL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

FLCH

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLQL

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF

Return for Risk

FLQL vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLQL

FLQL Risk / Return Rank: 72
FLQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FLQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FLQL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FLQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FLQL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 22
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLQL vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLQL	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	0.32	+0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	0.59	+1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.08	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	0.41	+1.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.82	1.20	+7.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLQL vs. FLCH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the FLCH Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLQL and FLCH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLQL	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	0.32	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	-0.17	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.02	+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between FLQL and FLCH is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FLQL vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

FLQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than FLCH's 2.51% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQL Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF	1.16%	1.10%	1.13%	1.50%	2.07%	1.81%	1.99%	1.78%	1.82%	1.22%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.51%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%

Drawdowns

FLQL vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLQL drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLQL and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLQL	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-62.09%	+28.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-17.18%	+5.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.41%	-56.06%	+34.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-33.69%	+27.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-30.49%	+26.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	5.96%	-3.46%

Volatility

FLQL vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) is 5.97%, while Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a volatility of 6.95%. This indicates that FLQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLQL	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	6.95%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.38%	13.95%	-3.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.56%	23.03%	-4.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	29.59%	-13.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.57%	28.07%	-10.50%