FLCH vs. ASHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX).
FLCH and ASHX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. ASHX is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2015. Both FLCH and ASHX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLCH vs. ASHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLCH vs. ASHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -5.65% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | 2.64% | 42.24% | 35.03% | -27.51% | -0.69% |
Returns By Period
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -12.56%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -4.85%
- 10Y*
- —
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCH vs. ASHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. ASHX — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
ASHX
FLCH vs. ASHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and ASHX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLCH vs. ASHX - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, while ASHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. ASHX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.49% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.50% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | — | — |
Volatility
FLCH vs. ASHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | ASHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | — | — |