FLCH vs. MCHI
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI).
FLCH and MCHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. MCHI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Index. It was launched on Mar 29, 2011. Both FLCH and MCHI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLCH vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLCH vs. MCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -5.65% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | -6.78% | 31.04% | 17.73% | -11.94% | -23.01% | -21.74% | 27.78% | 23.72% | -19.79% | 0.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly higher than MCHI's -6.78% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -12.56%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -4.85%
- 10Y*
- —
MCHI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -6.78%
- 6M
- -14.44%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 6.44%
- 5Y*
- -5.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCH vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. MCHI — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
MCHI
FLCH vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 0.21 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 0.45 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.06 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 0.30 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 0.79 | +0.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.21 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | -0.19 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.09 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and MCHI is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLCH vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than MCHI's 2.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.27% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, roughly equal to the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and MCHI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -62.95% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.65% | -17.17% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.06% | -57.18% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -62.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.49% | -36.43% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.50% | -24.40% | -6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | 6.63% | -0.61% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 6.44%, while iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | MCHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 6.82% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 14.83% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 23.85% | -0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 30.67% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 27.39% | +0.67% |