PortfoliosLab logo
FLCH vs. KWEB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLCH and KWEB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

FLCH vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-6.74%
-35.65%
FLCH
KWEB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLCH:

0.90

KWEB:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

FLCH:

1.44

KWEB:

1.02

Omega Ratio

FLCH:

1.20

KWEB:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

FLCH:

0.56

KWEB:

0.29

Martin Ratio

FLCH:

2.27

KWEB:

1.35

Ulcer Index

FLCH:

13.55%

KWEB:

15.66%

Daily Std Dev

FLCH:

34.24%

KWEB:

42.50%

Max Drawdown

FLCH:

-62.09%

KWEB:

-80.92%

Current Drawdown

FLCH:

-41.04%

KWEB:

-65.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's 9.47% return.


FLCH

YTD

10.87%

1M

-5.59%

6M

6.25%

1Y

28.19%

5Y*

-0.25%

10Y*

N/A

KWEB

YTD

9.47%

1M

-9.47%

6M

3.11%

1Y

18.20%

5Y*

-5.37%

10Y*

-0.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLCH vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for KWEB: current value is 0.76%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
KWEB: 0.76%
Expense ratio chart for FLCH: current value is 0.19%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FLCH: 0.19%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLCH vs. KWEB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLCH is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLCH is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLCH is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLCH is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLCH is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLCH is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

KWEB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KWEB is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KWEB is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KWEB is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KWEB is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KWEB is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KWEB is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLCH vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for FLCH, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FLCH: 0.90
KWEB: 0.50
The chart of Sortino ratio for FLCH, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FLCH: 1.44
KWEB: 1.02
The chart of Omega ratio for FLCH, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
FLCH: 1.20
KWEB: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for FLCH, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FLCH: 0.56
KWEB: 0.29
The chart of Martin ratio for FLCH, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FLCH: 2.27
KWEB: 1.35

The current FLCH Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCH and KWEB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.90
0.50
FLCH
KWEB

Dividends

FLCH vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than KWEB's 3.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
2.59%2.88%3.46%2.69%1.49%0.91%1.98%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
3.20%3.51%1.71%0.00%7.07%0.29%0.08%3.40%0.58%1.19%0.46%0.89%

Drawdowns

FLCH vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and KWEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-41.04%
-65.10%
FLCH
KWEB

Volatility

FLCH vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 14.22%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 15.98%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.22%
15.98%
FLCH
KWEB