PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLNG vs. LNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLNG vs. LNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNG achieves a 32.11% return, which is significantly higher than LNG's 24.74% return.


FLNG

1D
2.56%
1M
1.24%
YTD
32.11%
6M
28.96%
1Y
44.50%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
30.41%
10Y*

LNG

1D
0.47%
1M
0.79%
YTD
24.74%
6M
28.05%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
23.34%
10Y*
22.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLNG vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
32.11%22.47%-11.61%-1.19%56.32%202.13%-17.14%0.15%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
24.74%-8.70%27.18%15.02%49.30%69.48%-1.70%-6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FLNG and LNG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLNG:

$1.69B

LNG:

$50.79B

EPS

FLNG:

$1.40

LNG:

$6.80

PE Ratio

FLNG:

22.38

LNG:

35.48

PS Ratio

FLNG:

4.98

LNG:

2.58

PB Ratio

FLNG:

2.42

LNG:

13.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLNG:

$339.66M

LNG:

$20.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLNG:

$170.74M

LNG:

$5.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

FLNG:

$238.18M

LNG:

$5.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLNG vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNG
FLNG Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

LNG
LNG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNG vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLNGLNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.05

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

0.15

+3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.15

0.31

+9.84

FLNG vs. LNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the LNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNG and LNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLNG vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNG drawdown since its inception was -71.92%, smaller than the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNG and LNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLNGLNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.92%

-97.84%

+25.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-24.09%

+13.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.37%

-24.87%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.05%

-24.87%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-18.55%

+14.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-43.14%

+24.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

11.88%

-7.48%

Volatility

FLNG vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) is 5.51%, while Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that FLNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLNGLNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.51%

7.19%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.42%

21.49%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.69%

27.02%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.19%

30.27%

+8.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.30%

32.50%

+14.80%

Dividends

FLNG vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison

FLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than LNG's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
9.59%12.02%13.08%11.61%10.71%7.88%2.29%0.92%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.90%1.06%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FLNG vs. LNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FLEX LNG Ltd and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
80.46M
5.87B
(FLNG) Total Revenue
(LNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLNG vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FLEX LNG Ltd and Cheniere Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
45.7%
0
Portfolio components
FLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a gross profit of 36.75M and revenue of 80.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.

LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported an operating income of 34.20M and revenue of 80.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.

FLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a net income of 19.51M and revenue of 80.46M, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLNG and LNG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LNG has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to FLNG (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLNG dropped -71.92% vs LNG's -97.84%.

FLNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLNG and LNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer