FLNG vs. SGDM
FLNG (FLEX LNG Ltd) is a stock, while SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) is Materials fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Over the past 5 years, FLNG returned 28.91%/yr vs 18.63%/yr for SGDM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLNG vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLNG achieves a 25.52% return, which is significantly higher than SGDM's 1.41% return.
FLNG
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 25.52%
- 6M
- 20.73%
- 1Y
- 39.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 28.91%
- 10Y*
- —
SGDM
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 8.11%
- 1Y
- 56.96%
- 3Y*
- 38.97%
- 5Y*
- 18.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
FLNG vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLNG FLEX LNG Ltd | 25.52% | 22.47% | -11.61% | -1.19% | 56.32% | 202.13% | -17.14% | -1.73% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.41% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 25.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLNG and SGDM is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019 | 0.12 |
The correlation between FLNG and SGDM shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLNG vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank
FLNG
SGDM
FLNG vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLNG | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 1.91 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | 4.83 | +4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLNG | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.28 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.52 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.26 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
FLNG vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLNG drawdown since its inception was -71.92%, which is greater than SGDM's maximum drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNG and SGDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLNG | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.92% | -54.95% | -16.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | -30.04% | +18.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.37% | -30.04% | +4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.05% | -45.06% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.44% | -25.93% | +17.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.83% | -25.46% | +6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 11.83% | -7.60% |
Volatility
FLNG vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) is 7.76%, while Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that FLNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLNG | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.76% | 14.45% | -6.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.45% | 36.91% | -18.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.58% | 44.84% | -19.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.21% | 35.78% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.39% | 36.81% | +10.58% |
Dividends
FLNG vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison
FLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, more than SGDM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLNG FLEX LNG Ltd | 12.62% | 12.02% | 13.08% | 11.61% | 10.71% | 7.88% | 2.29% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.03% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLNG and SGDM have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDM has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to FLNG (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLNG dropped -71.92% vs SGDM's -54.95%.
FLNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLNG and SGDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer