PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLNG vs. SGDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLNG vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLNG vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
20.73%22.47%-11.61%-1.19%56.32%202.13%-17.14%-1.73%
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
13.63%153.46%12.14%2.34%-8.23%-9.15%21.85%25.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNG achieves a 20.73% return, which is significantly higher than SGDM's 13.63% return.


FLNG

1D
-1.38%
1M
3.86%
YTD
20.73%
6M
21.08%
1Y
44.94%
3Y*
6.88%
5Y*
41.63%
10Y*

SGDM

1D
4.81%
1M
-17.00%
YTD
13.63%
6M
27.33%
1Y
111.01%
3Y*
42.57%
5Y*
24.69%
10Y*
16.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLNG vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNG
FLNG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SGDM
SGDM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SGDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNG vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLNGSGDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

2.44

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

2.58

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

3.69

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.14

13.29

-3.15

FLNG vs. SGDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the SGDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNG and SGDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLNGSGDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.44

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.70

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.30

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between FLNG and SGDM is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLNG vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison

FLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.24%, more than SGDM's 0.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
10.24%12.02%13.08%11.61%10.71%7.88%2.29%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGDM
Sprott Gold Miners ETF
0.92%1.04%1.04%1.39%1.42%1.33%0.30%0.25%0.50%0.58%0.02%1.47%

Drawdowns

FLNG vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNG drawdown since its inception was -71.92%, which is greater than SGDM's maximum drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNG and SGDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLNGSGDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.92%

-54.95%

-16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-30.04%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.05%

-45.06%

+14.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.19%

-17.00%

+9.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.22%

-25.53%

+6.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

8.33%

-4.08%

Volatility

FLNG vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) is 10.50%, while Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a volatility of 16.86%. This indicates that FLNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLNGSGDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.50%

16.86%

-6.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.31%

38.34%

-20.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.18%

45.74%

-17.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.70%

35.29%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.80%

37.07%

+10.73%