PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLNG vs. TRMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLNG vs. TRMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and TORM plc (TRMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNG achieves a 25.52% return, which is significantly lower than TRMD's 51.10% return.


FLNG

1D
-2.01%
1M
-6.12%
YTD
25.52%
6M
20.73%
1Y
39.28%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
28.91%
10Y*

TRMD

1D
0.11%
1M
-12.81%
YTD
51.10%
6M
38.71%
1Y
87.62%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
42.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLNG vs. TRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
25.52%22.47%-11.61%-1.19%56.32%202.13%-17.14%-1.73%
TRMD
TORM plc
51.10%11.21%-23.37%31.64%297.66%12.91%-25.94%20.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FLNG and TRMD is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

0.39

The correlation between FLNG and TRMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FLNG:

$1.61B

TRMD:

$2.91B

EPS

FLNG:

$1.40

TRMD:

$3.40

PE Ratio

FLNG:

21.27

TRMD:

8.28

PS Ratio

FLNG:

4.73

TRMD:

2.02

PB Ratio

FLNG:

2.30

TRMD:

1.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

FLNG:

$339.66M

TRMD:

$1.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FLNG:

$170.74M

TRMD:

$575.03M

EBITDA (TTM)

FLNG:

$238.18M

TRMD:

$639.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLNG vs. TRMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNG
FLNG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

TRMD
TRMD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNG vs. TRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and TORM plc (TRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLNGTRMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

4.39

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

11.44

-2.12

FLNG vs. TRMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the TRMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNG and TRMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLNGTRMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.32

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.93

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.48

+0.08

Drawdowns

FLNG vs. TRMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNG drawdown since its inception was -71.92%, which is greater than TRMD's maximum drawdown of -60.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNG and TRMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLNGTRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.92%

-60.59%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.05%

-20.06%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.37%

-60.59%

+35.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.05%

-60.59%

+29.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.44%

-17.33%

+8.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-22.58%

+3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

7.69%

-3.46%

Volatility

FLNG vs. TRMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) is 7.76%, while TORM plc (TRMD) has a volatility of 14.52%. This indicates that FLNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLNGTRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

14.52%

-6.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

27.84%

-9.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.58%

38.07%

-12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.21%

46.00%

-6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.39%

59.90%

-12.51%

Dividends

FLNG vs. TRMD - Dividend Comparison

FLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, more than TRMD's 8.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
12.62%12.02%13.08%11.61%10.71%7.88%2.29%0.92%
TRMD
TORM plc
8.59%10.32%30.13%23.05%6.99%0.00%14.89%0.00%

Financials

FLNG vs. TRMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FLEX LNG Ltd and TORM plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
80.46M
395.84M
(FLNG) Total Revenue
(TRMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FLNG vs. TRMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FLEX LNG Ltd and TORM plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
45.7%
39.9%
Portfolio components
FLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a gross profit of 36.75M and revenue of 80.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.

TRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported a gross profit of 157.74M and revenue of 395.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

FLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported an operating income of 34.20M and revenue of 80.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

TRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported an operating income of 135.10M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.1%.

FLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a net income of 19.51M and revenue of 80.46M, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.

TRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TORM plc reported a net income of 120.52M and revenue of 395.84M, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FLNG and TRMD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRMD has higher volatility (14.52%) compared to FLNG (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLNG dropped -71.92% vs TRMD's -60.59%.

TRMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLNG and TRMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer