FLNG vs. GLNG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and Golar LNG Limited (GLNG).

Performance

FLNG vs. GLNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and Golar LNG Limited (GLNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLNG vs. GLNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FLNG FLEX LNG Ltd	22.42%	22.47%	-11.61%	-1.19%	56.32%	202.13%	-17.14%	-1.73%
GLNG Golar LNG Limited	46.19%	-9.74%	90.78%	4.39%	83.94%	28.53%	-32.21%	-15.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FLNG : $1.61B GLNG : $5.48B
EPS FLNG : $1.38 GLNG : $0.64
PE Ratio FLNG : 21.48 GLNG : 84.05
PS Ratio FLNG : 4.62 GLNG : 14.03
PB Ratio FLNG : 2.23 GLNG : 2.98
Total Revenue (TTM) FLNG : $347.64M GLNG : $393.52M
Gross Profit (TTM) FLNG : $183.77M GLNG : $184.37M
EBITDA (TTM) FLNG : $244.17M GLNG : $201.12M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLNG achieves a 22.42% return, which is significantly lower than GLNG's 46.19% return.

FLNG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 8.75%
• YTD: 22.42%
• 6M: 24.77%
• 1Y: 45.05%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: 42.02%
• 10Y*: —

GLNG

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 22.35%
• YTD: 46.19%
• 6M: 35.50%
• 1Y: 45.82%
• 3Y*: 40.49%
• 5Y*: 41.07%
• 10Y*: 13.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FLNG vs. GLNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLNG

FLNG Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 90

GLNG

GLNG Risk / Return Rank: 77
GLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
GLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
GLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLNG vs. GLNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) and Golar LNG Limited (GLNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLNG	GLNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.25	+0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.90	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.25	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	2.11	+1.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.47	4.55	+5.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLNG vs. GLNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the GLNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLNG and GLNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLNG	GLNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	1.25	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	1.04	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.25	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.56	0.20	+0.36

Correlation

The correlation between FLNG and GLNG is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FLNG vs. GLNG - Dividend Comparison

FLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than GLNG's 1.85% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLNG FLEX LNG Ltd	10.10%	12.02%	13.08%	11.61%	10.71%	7.88%	2.29%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GLNG Golar LNG Limited	1.85%	2.69%	2.36%	3.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.11%	1.72%	0.67%	0.87%	11.40%

Drawdowns

FLNG vs. GLNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLNG drawdown since its inception was -71.92%, smaller than the maximum GLNG drawdown of -92.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLNG and GLNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLNG	GLNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.92%	-92.81%	+20.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-21.95%	+10.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.05%	-33.35%	+2.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-86.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.89%	-6.96%	+1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.23%	-44.08%	+24.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	10.17%	-5.88%

Volatility

FLNG vs. GLNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) is 10.99%, while Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that FLNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLNG	GLNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.99%	12.28%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.25%	22.11%	-3.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.14%	36.90%	-8.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.70%	39.94%	+0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.81%	54.53%	-6.72%

Financials

FLNG vs. GLNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FLEX LNG Ltd and Golar LNG Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a gross profit of 44.30M and revenue of 87.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

GLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported a gross profit of 68.50M and revenue of 132.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.6%.

FLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported an operating income of 42.62M and revenue of 87.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.7%.

GLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported an operating income of 60.22M and revenue of 132.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.3%.

FLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a net income of 21.55M and revenue of 87.54M, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.

GLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Golar LNG Limited reported a net income of 10.36M and revenue of 132.81M, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.