FLM vs. FDL
FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FLM is a Building & Construction fund tracking the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
FLM vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLM
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
FLM vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | -4.55% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | -2.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLM and FDL is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | -0.40 |
FLM vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLM
FDL
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
FLM
FDL
Energy
FLM
FDL
Technology
FLM
FDL
Basic Materials
FLM
FDL
Real Estate
FLM
FDL
-
Communication Services
FLM
FDL
Utilities
FLM
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
FLM
-
FDL
Consumer Defensive
FLM
-
FDL
Financial Services
FLM
-
FDL
Healthcare
FLM
-
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLM vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
FLM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
FLM vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.71 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLM vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -65.93% | +61.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | -4.24% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -9.64% | +7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility
FLM vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.02% | 11.51% | +39.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 14.30% | +36.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 17.13% | +33.89% |
FLM vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLM vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.74% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLM and FDL have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.
FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for FLM and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer