PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLM vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLM vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLM

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

AIRR

1D
1.59%
1M
-7.04%
6M
6.28%
YTD
19.12%
1Y
37.54%
3Y*
29.02%
5Y*
23.37%
10Y*
20.11%
ALL TIME*
15.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$86.28M$88.15M$93.52M

FLM vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FLM and AIRR is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026

0.26

FLM vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLM
AIRR

Industrials

32.5%
77.6%

Energy

8.1%
1.7%

Technology

7.9%
3.4%

Basic Materials

7.4%
3.4%

Real Estate

5.7%

-

Communication Services

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

12.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

FLM
32.5%
AIRR
77.6%

Energy

FLM
8.1%
AIRR
1.7%

Technology

FLM
7.9%
AIRR
3.4%

Basic Materials

FLM
7.4%
AIRR
3.4%

Real Estate

FLM
5.7%
AIRR

-

Communication Services

FLM
0.7%
AIRR

-

Utilities

FLM
0.7%
AIRR

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLM

-

AIRR
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FLM

-

AIRR

-

Financial Services

FLM

-

AIRR
12.1%

Healthcare

FLM

-

AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLM vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLM vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLMAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

FLM vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLM vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

Volatility

FLM vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.47%

FLM vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLM vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.09%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
FLM
First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLM and AIRR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.

AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.

FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.69% for AIRR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLM and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer