FLM vs. AIRR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both Building & Construction funds from First Trust - FLM tracks the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index while AIRR tracks the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.

Performance

FLM vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLM

• 1D: -4.55%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIRR

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 35.61%
• 6M: 31.10%
• 1Y: 71.43%
• 3Y*: 37.98%
• 5Y*: 27.26%
• 10Y*: 22.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLM vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	-4.55%
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLM and AIRR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026	0.50

FLM vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLM	AIRR
Industrials	37.1%	92.4%
Energy	8.1%	3.8%
Technology	7.9%	0.7%
Basic Materials	7.4%	-
Real Estate	5.7%	-
Communication Services	0.7%	-
Utilities	0.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	6.9%
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

FLM vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIRR

AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 85
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLM vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLM	AIRR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.74	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.45	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.49	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.05	—

Drawdowns

FLM vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and AIRR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLM	AIRR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-42.37%	+37.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.09%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.55%	0.00%	-4.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-7.47%	+5.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLM	AIRR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.02%	26.28%	+24.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.02%	25.42%	+25.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.02%	26.35%	+24.67%

FLM vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLM vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF	0.13%	0.19%	0.18%	0.23%	0.12%	0.05%	0.10%	0.20%	0.43%	0.30%	0.08%	0.47%
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLM and AIRR in my portfolio?

FLM and AIRR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLM or AIRR?

On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLM or AIRR?

AIRR is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLM or AIRR?

AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.

What is the main difference between FLM and AIRR?

FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.69% for AIRR.