FLM vs. PKB
FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) are both Building & Construction funds - FLM tracks the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index while PKB tracks the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PKB.
Performance
FLM vs. PKB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLM
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PKB
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 10.39%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 18.38%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
FLM vs. PKB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | -4.55% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 5.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLM and PKB is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.50 |
FLM vs. PKB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLM
PKB
Industrials
Energy
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
FLM
PKB
Energy
FLM
PKB
Technology
FLM
PKB
-
Basic Materials
FLM
PKB
Real Estate
FLM
PKB
-
Communication Services
FLM
PKB
-
Utilities
FLM
PKB
Consumer Cyclical
FLM
-
PKB
Consumer Defensive
FLM
-
PKB
-
Financial Services
FLM
-
PKB
Healthcare
FLM
-
PKB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLM vs. PKB — Risk / Return Rank
FLM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PKB
FLM vs. PKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLM | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLM vs. PKB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum PKB drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and PKB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLM | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -65.21% | +60.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | 0.00% | -4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -15.74% | +13.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.86% | — |
Volatility
FLM vs. PKB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLM | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.02% | 23.90% | +27.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 25.80% | +25.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 27.32% | +23.70% |
FLM vs. PKB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PKB's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLM vs. PKB - Dividend Comparison
FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.23% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLM and PKB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PKB is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PKB is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.
PKB has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.
FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.60% for PKB.
Find the right allocation for FLM and PKB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer