FLM vs. SIJ
FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and SIJ (ProShares UltraShort Industrials) are both exchange-traded funds - FLM is a Building & Construction fund tracking the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while SIJ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Industrials -IND (-200%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SIJ.
Performance
FLM vs. SIJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLM
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIJ
- 1D
- 4.06%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -25.33%
- 6M
- -23.44%
- 1Y
- -34.59%
- 3Y*
- -29.64%
- 5Y*
- -19.68%
- 10Y*
- -28.32%
FLM vs. SIJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | -4.55% |
SIJ ProShares UltraShort Industrials | -3.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLM and SIJ is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLM vs. SIJ — Risk / Return Rank
FLM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIJ
FLM vs. SIJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and ProShares UltraShort Industrials (SIJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLM | SIJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLM vs. SIJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum SIJ drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and SIJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLM | SIJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -99.93% | +95.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -71.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | -99.93% | +95.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -86.76% | +84.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.46% | — |
Volatility
FLM vs. SIJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLM | SIJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.02% | 33.38% | +17.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 36.14% | +14.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 39.73% | +11.29% |
FLM vs. SIJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SIJ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLM vs. SIJ - Dividend Comparison
FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIJ ProShares UltraShort Industrials | 6.06% | 5.38% | 5.99% | 4.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.49% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLM and SIJ have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SIJ.
SIJ has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.
FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while SIJ is Leveraged Equities. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while SIJ tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Industrials -IND (-200%). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.95% for SIJ.
Find the right allocation for FLM and SIJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer