FLM vs. VOO
FLM (First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLM is a Building & Construction fund tracking the ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLM charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
FLM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FLM
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
FLM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | -4.55% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLM and VOO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026 | 0.40 |
FLM vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLM
VOO
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
FLM
VOO
Energy
FLM
VOO
Technology
FLM
VOO
Basic Materials
FLM
VOO
Real Estate
FLM
VOO
Communication Services
FLM
VOO
Utilities
FLM
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
FLM
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
FLM
-
VOO
Financial Services
FLM
-
VOO
Healthcare
FLM
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FLM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VOO
FLM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF (FLM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLM drawdown since its inception was -4.55%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLM and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -33.99% | +29.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.55% | -1.74% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -3.68% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
FLM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLM | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.02% | 12.39% | +38.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 16.90% | +34.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.02% | 18.05% | +32.97% |
FLM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLM has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FLM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLM First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLM and VOO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FLM.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for FLM.
FLM is categorized as Building & Construction, while VOO is S&P 500. FLM tracks ISE Global Engineering & Construction Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FLM and 0.03% for VOO.
Find the right allocation for FLM and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer