FLKR vs. FLAX
FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and FLAX (Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Franklin Templeton - FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index while FLAX tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 19.48%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for FLAX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLAX.
Performance
FLKR vs. FLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 114.41% return, which is significantly higher than FLAX's 29.31% return.
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 29.00%
- YTD
- 114.41%
- 6M
- 130.14%
- 1Y
- 238.40%
- 3Y*
- 51.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FLAX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 29.31%
- 6M
- 32.11%
- 1Y
- 58.93%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR vs. FLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 114.41% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -15.84% |
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | 29.31% | 33.72% | 9.82% | 6.27% | -18.88% | -3.54% | 24.17% | 17.19% | -12.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLKR and FLAX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FLKR and FLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLKR vs. FLAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLKR
FLAX
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
FLKR
FLAX
Industrials
FLKR
FLAX
Financial Services
FLKR
FLAX
Consumer Cyclical
FLKR
FLAX
Basic Materials
FLKR
FLAX
Healthcare
FLKR
FLAX
Communication Services
FLKR
FLAX
Consumer Defensive
FLKR
FLAX
Energy
FLKR
FLAX
Utilities
FLKR
FLAX
Real Estate
FLKR
-
FLAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLKR vs. FLAX — Risk / Return Rank
FLKR
FLAX
FLKR vs. FLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLKR | FLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.83 | 3.11 | +2.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.23 | 4.06 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.57 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.42 | 4.56 | +5.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.67 | 17.96 | +20.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLKR | FLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.83 | 3.11 | +2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.42 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.44 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
FLKR vs. FLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than FLAX's maximum drawdown of -42.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and FLAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLKR | FLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.06% | -42.51% | -7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.03% | -12.99% | -10.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -19.29% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.51% | -38.75% | -10.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -1.11% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.07% | -15.41% | -6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.20% | 3.29% | +2.91% |
Volatility
FLKR vs. FLAX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 20.21% compared to Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) at 8.58%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLKR | FLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.21% | 8.58% | +11.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.52% | 16.54% | +19.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.18% | 19.07% | +22.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.19% | 19.02% | +9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.56% | 19.93% | +7.63% |
FLKR vs. FLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLAX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLKR vs. FLAX - Dividend Comparison
FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than FLAX's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | 1.83% | 2.37% | 3.12% | 2.20% | 2.86% | 2.38% | 1.57% | 2.23% | 2.35% | 0.00% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.80% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLKR and FLAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to FLAX (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs FLAX's -42.51%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 7.95% for FLAX. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAX has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLAX.
FLAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.
FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.19% for FLAX.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLKR and FLAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer