PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLKR vs. FLAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLKR vs. FLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 114.41% return, which is significantly higher than FLAX's 29.31% return.


FLKR

1D
-0.79%
1M
29.00%
YTD
114.41%
6M
130.14%
1Y
238.40%
3Y*
51.14%
5Y*
19.48%
10Y*

FLAX

1D
-1.11%
1M
10.05%
YTD
29.31%
6M
32.11%
1Y
58.93%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. FLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
114.41%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-15.84%
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
29.31%33.72%9.82%6.27%-18.88%-3.54%24.17%17.19%-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and FLAX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.76

The correlation between FLKR and FLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLKR vs. FLAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLKR
FLAX

Technology

64.3%
39.7%

Industrials

12.8%
9.2%

Financial Services

7.6%
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
10.2%

Basic Materials

2.6%
4.2%

Healthcare

2.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

1.6%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
2.8%

Energy

0.4%
3.0%

Utilities

0.3%
2.1%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

FLKR
64.3%
FLAX
39.7%

Industrials

FLKR
12.8%
FLAX
9.2%

Financial Services

FLKR
7.6%
FLAX
17.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FLKR
6.0%
FLAX
10.2%

Basic Materials

FLKR
2.6%
FLAX
4.2%

Healthcare

FLKR
2.5%
FLAX
3.3%

Communication Services

FLKR
1.6%
FLAX
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLKR
1.5%
FLAX
2.8%

Energy

FLKR
0.4%
FLAX
3.0%

Utilities

FLKR
0.3%
FLAX
2.1%

Real Estate

FLKR

-

FLAX
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLKR vs. FLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FLAX
FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. FLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLKRFLAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.83

3.11

+2.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.23

4.06

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.57

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.42

4.56

+5.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

38.67

17.96

+20.71

FLKR vs. FLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 5.83, which is higher than the FLAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and FLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLKRFLAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.83

3.11

+2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.42

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.44

+0.11

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. FLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than FLAX's maximum drawdown of -42.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and FLAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLKRFLAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.06%

-42.51%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.03%

-12.99%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-19.29%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.51%

-38.75%

-10.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-1.11%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-15.41%

-6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.20%

3.29%

+2.91%

Volatility

FLKR vs. FLAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 20.21% compared to Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) at 8.58%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLKRFLAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.21%

8.58%

+11.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.52%

16.54%

+19.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.18%

19.07%

+22.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.19%

19.02%

+9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.56%

19.93%

+7.63%

FLKR vs. FLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FLAX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLKR vs. FLAX - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than FLAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
1.83%2.37%3.12%2.20%2.86%2.38%1.57%2.23%2.35%0.00%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
1.80%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLKR and FLAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to FLAX (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs FLAX's -42.51%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 7.95% for FLAX. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAX has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLAX.

FLAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.

FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.19% for FLAX.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLKR and FLAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer