FLKR vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while EFAS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLKR returned 17.78%/yr vs 12.41%/yr for EFAS. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLKR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

FLKR vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLKR achieves a 98.10% return, which is significantly higher than EFAS's 15.45% return.

FLKR

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 98.10%
• 6M: 113.45%
• 1Y: 191.57%
• 3Y*: 45.52%
• 5Y*: 17.78%
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 6M: 18.87%
• 1Y: 29.12%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLKR vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	98.10%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	3.00%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	15.45%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	-5.42%	14.60%	-11.60%	3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FLKR and EFAS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between FLKR and EFAS has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLKR vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLKR	EFAS
Technology	64.3%	0.1%
Industrials	12.8%	9.9%
Financial Services	7.6%	30.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	2.6%	1.8%
Healthcare	2.5%	0.1%
Communication Services	1.6%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.5%	8.1%
Energy	0.4%	13.7%
Utilities	0.3%	14.4%
Real Estate	-	11.3%

Return for Risk

FLKR vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 89
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLKR vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLKR	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.08	2.75	+1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	3.86	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.48	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.11	5.64	+2.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	28.21	14.75	+13.46

FLKR vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLKR Sharpe Ratio is 4.08, which is higher than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLKR and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLKR vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLKR drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, which is greater than EFAS's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLKR and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLKR	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-44.38%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.03%	-5.30%	-17.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	-11.84%	-14.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.51%	-28.81%	-20.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.25%	-0.87%	-8.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.03%	-7.06%	-14.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.61%	2.02%	+4.59%

Volatility

FLKR vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a higher volatility of 25.85% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.35%. This indicates that FLKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLKR	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.85%	3.35%	+22.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.11%	8.58%	+33.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.82%	10.87%	+34.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.58%	15.62%	+13.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.37%	18.32%	+10.05%

FLKR vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLKR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLKR vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

FLKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than EFAS's 4.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.62%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.95%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLKR and EFAS in my portfolio?

FLKR and EFAS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLKR or EFAS?

FLKR has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to EFAS (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLKR dropped -50.06% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, FLKR or EFAS?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 17.78% vs 12.41% for EFAS. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLKR or EFAS?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 17.78% return vs 12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLKR or EFAS?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for EFAS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLKR or EFAS?

EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 1.95% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between FLKR and EFAS?

FLKR is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EFAS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index, while EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLKR and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.