PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFAS vs. FDHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EFAS vs. FDHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EFAS vs. FDHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
10.06%46.83%3.07%14.65%-8.00%12.75%-5.42%14.60%-10.79%
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
-0.03%9.24%7.53%11.14%-11.30%4.33%10.71%16.87%-2.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly higher than FDHY's -0.03% return.


EFAS

1D
2.54%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
10.06%
6M
15.25%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*

FDHY

1D
0.93%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
1.70%
1Y
7.87%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EFAS vs. FDHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FDHY's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EFAS vs. FDHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFAS
EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FDHY
FDHY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FDHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FDHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDHY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFAS vs. FDHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFASFDHYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.83

1.50

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

2.16

+1.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.34

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

1.78

+1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.19

9.89

+7.30

EFAS vs. FDHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the FDHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAS and FDHY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFASFDHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

1.50

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.54

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.69

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and FDHY is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EFAS vs. FDHY - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than FDHY's 6.60% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EFAS
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF
4.54%4.83%6.76%6.33%7.28%5.19%4.34%5.75%6.63%6.15%0.21%
FDHY
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
6.60%6.56%6.58%6.26%5.34%6.09%5.78%4.94%2.55%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. FDHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, which is greater than FDHY's maximum drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and FDHY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EFASFDHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.38%

-20.01%

-24.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-4.54%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-16.38%

-12.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-1.21%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-2.93%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

0.82%

+1.46%

Volatility

EFAS vs. FDHY - Volatility Comparison

Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF (FDHY) at 1.89%. This indicates that EFAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EFASFDHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

1.89%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

2.72%

+5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

5.29%

+8.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

7.11%

+8.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

8.12%

+10.33%