EFAS vs. SDEM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) and SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EFAS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while SDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EFAS returned 14.43%/yr vs 6.12%/yr for SDEM. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EFAS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for SDEM.

Performance

EFAS vs. SDEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFAS achieves a 20.56% return, which is significantly higher than SDEM's 13.99% return.

EFAS

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 6.31%
• 6M: 14.73%
• YTD: 20.56%
• 1Y: 32.01%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 14.43%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.80%

SDEM

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 4.50%
• 6M: 5.07%
• YTD: 13.99%
• 1Y: 28.41%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 6.12%
• 10Y*: 4.40%
• ALL TIME*: 3.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	$411.25K	$354.75K	$345.09K
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	$101.46K	$99.85K	$114.98K

EFAS vs. SDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	20.56%	46.83%	3.07%	14.65%	-8.00%	12.75%	-5.42%	14.60%	-11.60%	22.76%
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	13.99%	32.01%	4.02%	12.64%	-21.53%	2.11%	-11.13%	17.56%	-17.40%	16.57%

Correlation

The correlation between EFAS and SDEM is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2016	0.58

The correlation between EFAS and SDEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

EFAS vs. SDEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EFAS	SDEM
Financial Services	35.3%	27.7%
Real Estate	15.6%	7.7%
Utilities	11.8%	7.2%
Energy	10.3%	3.6%
Communication Services	8.9%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	5.4%
Industrials	6.6%	10.2%
Basic Materials	1.9%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	6.0%
Healthcare	0.1%	1.9%
Technology	0.1%	2.5%

Return for Risk

EFAS vs. SDEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 94
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SDEM

SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 83
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EFAS vs. SDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EFAS	SDEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.94	2.05	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	2.86	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.35	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.07	3.23	+2.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.92	9.60	+5.32

EFAS vs. SDEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the SDEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFAS and SDEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EFAS vs. SDEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum SDEM drawdown of -47.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and SDEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EFAS	SDEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.38%	-47.38%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.30%	-9.03%	+3.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.84%	-12.34%	+0.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.81%	-36.08%	+7.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-1.04%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-20.46%	+13.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	3.03%	-0.88%

Volatility

EFAS vs. SDEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) is 2.71%, while Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that EFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EFAS	SDEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.71%	3.94%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	11.69%	-3.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.95%	14.28%	-3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.51%	17.47%	-1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.23%	19.05%	-0.82%

EFAS vs. SDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EFAS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SDEM's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

EFAS vs. SDEM - Dividend Comparison

EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than SDEM's 4.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.52%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%	0.00%
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	4.91%	5.27%	7.28%	7.50%	8.86%	8.14%	6.30%	6.47%	6.55%	5.01%	5.06%	6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EFAS and SDEM in my portfolio?

EFAS and SDEM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EFAS or SDEM?

SDEM has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to EFAS (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EFAS dropped -44.38% vs SDEM's -47.38%.

Which ETF is better, EFAS or SDEM?

On 5-year performance, EFAS leads with 14.43% vs 6.12% for SDEM. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EFAS or SDEM?

Over the 5-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EFAS or SDEM?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for SDEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EFAS or SDEM?

SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 4.52% for EFAS.

What is the main difference between EFAS and SDEM?

EFAS is categorized as Dividend, while SDEM is Emerging Markets Equities. EFAS tracks MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index, while SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EFAS and 0.67% for SDEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.