EFAS vs. EFA
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA).
EFAS and EFA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EFAS is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. It was launched on Nov 14, 2016. EFA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Aug 14, 2001. Both EFAS and EFA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EFAS or EFA.
Correlation
The correlation between EFAS and EFA is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EFAS vs. EFA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EFAS:
0.58
EFA:
0.66
EFAS:
0.86
EFA:
0.97
EFAS:
1.10
EFA:
1.12
EFAS:
0.75
EFA:
0.82
EFAS:
1.90
EFA:
2.00
EFAS:
3.99%
EFA:
4.16%
EFAS:
13.20%
EFA:
12.67%
EFAS:
-44.38%
EFA:
-61.04%
EFAS:
-7.25%
EFA:
-7.82%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EFAS having a 1.51% return and EFA slightly higher at 1.55%.
EFAS
1.51%
2.90%
-0.69%
6.91%
3.06%
N/A
EFA
1.55%
1.95%
-2.14%
7.11%
4.74%
5.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EFAS vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EFAS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EFAS vs. EFA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EFAS
EFA
EFAS vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EFAS vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison
EFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%, more than EFA's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 6.69% | 6.79% | 6.37% | 7.30% | 5.20% | 4.38% | 5.75% | 6.62% | 6.17% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.19% | 3.24% | 2.98% | 2.69% | 3.33% | 2.13% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 2.57% | 3.07% | 2.76% | 3.72% |
Drawdowns
EFAS vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFAS drawdown since its inception was -44.38%, smaller than the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFAS and EFA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EFAS vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison
Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) at 3.75%. This indicates that EFAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.