FLCH vs. REG
FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index, while REG (Regency Centers Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FLCH returned -4.30%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for REG. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLCH vs. REG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than REG's 21.29% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- -12.52%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 1Y
- -3.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- -4.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.20%
REG
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.92%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.14%
FLCH vs. REG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -9.29% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 1.51% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 21.29% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | -12.00% | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and REG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.18 |
The correlation between FLCH and REG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. REG — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
REG
FLCH vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLCH | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.24 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 2.75 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 6.81 | -7.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, smaller than the maximum REG drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and REG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -73.37% | +11.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.48% | -8.17% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -15.10% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.45% | -30.09% | -22.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.06% | -0.65% | -35.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.61% | -16.13% | -14.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.77% | 3.29% | +6.48% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. REG - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 5.73%. This indicates that FLCH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 5.73% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.05% | 11.91% | +2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.88% | 16.46% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.62% | 22.22% | +7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.82% | 29.91% | -2.09% |
Dividends
FLCH vs. REG - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than REG's 3.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.62% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLCH and REG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLCH has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to REG (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCH dropped -62.09% vs REG's -73.37%.
REG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLCH and REG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer