FLCH vs. CNXT
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT).
FLCH and CNXT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. CNXT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2014. Both FLCH and CNXT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLCH vs. CNXT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLCH vs. CNXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -5.65% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 3.20% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | -2.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLCH achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than CNXT's 3.20% return.
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -12.56%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -4.85%
- 10Y*
- —
CNXT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 65.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLCH vs. CNXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLCH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CNXT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLCH vs. CNXT — Risk / Return Rank
FLCH
CNXT
FLCH vs. CNXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) and VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLCH | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | 2.06 | -1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.59 | 2.57 | -1.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.36 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 3.71 | -3.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 13.62 | -12.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLCH | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 2.06 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.04 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.16 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLCH and CNXT is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLCH vs. CNXT - Dividend Comparison
FLCH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than CNXT's 0.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
Drawdowns
FLCH vs. CNXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLCH drawdown since its inception was -62.09%, smaller than the maximum CNXT drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCH and CNXT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLCH | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.09% | -68.98% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.65% | -17.35% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.06% | -61.21% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.49% | -24.37% | -9.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.50% | -43.41% | +12.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.02% | 4.73% | +1.29% |
Volatility
FLCH vs. CNXT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) is 6.44%, while VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that FLCH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLCH | CNXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 7.46% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 19.80% | -5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.03% | 31.89% | -8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 34.92% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 31.54% | -3.48% |