CNXT vs. KSTR

In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a -3.33% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR's 3.15% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than KSTR's 0.89% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the KSTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and KSTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while KSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, roughly equal to the maximum KSTR drawdown of -66.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and KSTR.

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) at 4.82%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.