PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNXT vs. YINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNXT vs. YINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 36.42% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -42.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has outperformed YINN with an annualized return of 7.44%, while YINN has yielded a comparatively lower -19.74% annualized return.


CNXT

1D
-4.05%
1M
7.53%
YTD
36.42%
6M
34.79%
1Y
122.39%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
7.44%

YINN

1D
-6.15%
1M
-21.32%
YTD
-42.95%
6M
-44.25%
1Y
-37.35%
3Y*
-8.25%
5Y*
-41.05%
10Y*
-19.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNXT vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
36.42%59.31%12.42%-21.47%-35.58%8.78%63.30%42.66%-39.48%20.19%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-42.95%54.21%36.06%-53.08%-71.97%-58.56%-7.75%28.92%-48.47%129.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CNXT and YINN is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014

0.58

The correlation between CNXT and YINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNXT vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNXT
YINN

Industrials

42.4%
3.2%

Technology

39.9%
5.4%

Basic Materials

4.7%
3.9%

Healthcare

3.8%
2.3%

Financial Services

3.4%
34.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
0.9%

Communication Services

1.0%
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
26.4%

Energy

-

5.3%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Industrials

CNXT
42.4%
YINN
3.2%

Technology

CNXT
39.9%
YINN
5.4%

Basic Materials

CNXT
4.7%
YINN
3.9%

Healthcare

CNXT
3.8%
YINN
2.3%

Financial Services

CNXT
3.4%
YINN
34.8%

Consumer Defensive

CNXT
1.4%
YINN
0.9%

Communication Services

CNXT
1.0%
YINN
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CNXT
0.7%
YINN
26.4%

Energy

CNXT

-

YINN
5.3%

Real Estate

CNXT

-

YINN
1.1%

Utilities

CNXT

-

YINN
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNXT vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT
CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNXT vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNXTYINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.92

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.08

-0.66

+10.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.76

-1.40

+31.15

CNXT vs. YINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the YINN Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and YINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNXT vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and YINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNXTYINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.98%

-98.87%

+29.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-56.99%

+44.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.60%

-69.08%

+20.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.21%

-96.28%

+35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.30%

-98.59%

+35.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.05%

-97.98%

+93.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.76%

-68.55%

+25.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

26.77%

-22.64%

Volatility

CNXT vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is 12.58%, while Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a volatility of 18.21%. This indicates that CNXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNXTYINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.58%

18.21%

-5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.32%

43.73%

-21.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.27%

59.15%

-26.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.52%

94.33%

-58.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.77%

81.59%

-49.82%

CNXT vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNXT vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than YINN's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNXT
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF
0.13%0.18%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.22%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.75%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNXT and YINN have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YINN has higher volatility (18.21%) compared to CNXT (12.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs YINN's -98.87%.

On 10-year performance, CNXT leads with 7.44% vs -19.74% for YINN. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CNXT has been the lower-risk option at 12.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 7.44% return vs -19.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.

CNXT is categorized as China Equities, while YINN is Leveraged Equities. CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 1.52% for YINN.

CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNXT and YINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer