CNXT vs. FXI
CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds - CNXT tracks the SME-ChiNext 100 Index while FXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CNXT returned 7.89%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for FXI. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
CNXT vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 42.18% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 7.89%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.
CNXT
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 12.07%
- YTD
- 42.18%
- 6M
- 40.51%
- 1Y
- 133.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
FXI
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -12.04%
- 6M
- -12.81%
- 1Y
- -4.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- -3.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
CNXT vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 42.18% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -12.04% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and FXI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014 | 0.58 |
The correlation between CNXT and FXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
CNXT vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CNXT
FXI
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
CNXT
FXI
Technology
CNXT
FXI
Basic Materials
CNXT
FXI
Healthcare
CNXT
FXI
Financial Services
CNXT
FXI
Consumer Defensive
CNXT
FXI
Communication Services
CNXT
FXI
Consumer Cyclical
CNXT
FXI
Energy
CNXT
-
FXI
Real Estate
CNXT
-
FXI
Utilities
CNXT
-
FXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNXT vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
CNXT
FXI
CNXT vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNXT | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 0.98 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.00 | -0.22 | +11.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.51 | -0.52 | +33.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXT | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.98% | -72.68% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -18.77% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.60% | -28.72% | -19.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | -54.94% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.30% | -60.81% | -2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -30.73% | +30.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.78% | -31.21% | -11.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 8.03% | -3.91% |
Volatility
CNXT vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 11.81% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 5.87%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNXT | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 5.87% | +5.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.89% | 14.60% | +7.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.03% | 19.96% | +12.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.48% | 31.71% | +3.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.76% | 27.66% | +4.10% |
CNXT vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNXT vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than FXI's 2.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.03% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNXT and FXI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNXT has higher volatility (11.81%) compared to FXI (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs FXI's -72.68%.
On 10-year performance, CNXT leads with 7.89% vs 2.74% for FXI. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 7.89% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.
CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 0.74% for FXI.
CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNXT and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer