PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNXT vs. FXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNXT vs. FXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF (CNXT) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 9.28% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 5.01%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.81% annualized return.


CNXT

1D
0.53%
1M
-15.61%
6M
3.55%
YTD
9.28%
1Y
56.49%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
5.01%
ALL TIME*
6.44%

FXI

1D
-0.05%
1M
14.38%
6M
-7.16%
YTD
-3.96%
1Y
0.93%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
2.81%
ALL TIME*
5.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.43M$5.58M$7.74M
$773.89M$798.32M$975.73M

CNXT vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF
9.28%59.31%12.42%-21.47%-35.58%8.78%63.30%42.66%-39.48%20.19%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-3.96%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%14.90%-13.28%36.26%

Correlation

The correlation between CNXT and FXI is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2014

0.58

The correlation between CNXT and FXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CNXT vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNXT
FXI

Technology

53.5%
5.9%

Industrials

27.0%
2.8%

Healthcare

5.0%
2.6%

Basic Materials

4.5%
3.4%

Financial Services

4.1%
35.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
0.8%

Communication Services

0.9%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.7%
25.3%

Energy

-

4.8%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Technology

CNXT
53.5%
FXI
5.9%

Industrials

CNXT
27.0%
FXI
2.8%

Healthcare

CNXT
5.0%
FXI
2.6%

Basic Materials

CNXT
4.5%
FXI
3.4%

Financial Services

CNXT
4.1%
FXI
35.2%

Consumer Defensive

CNXT
1.8%
FXI
0.8%

Communication Services

CNXT
0.9%
FXI
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

CNXT
0.7%
FXI
25.3%

Energy

CNXT

-

FXI
4.8%

Real Estate

CNXT

-

FXI
1.0%

Utilities

CNXT

-

FXI
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNXT vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNXT
CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNXT vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF (CNXT) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNXTFXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.01

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

-0.03

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

-0.07

+8.76

CNXT vs. FXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the FXI Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and FXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNXT vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and FXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNXTFXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.98%

-72.68%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.23%

-22.94%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.60%

-26.62%

-21.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.21%

-49.88%

-11.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.30%

-60.81%

-2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.36%

-24.37%

+1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-31.21%

-11.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

10.00%

-3.49%

Volatility

CNXT vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 17.27% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 5.14%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNXTFXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.27%

5.14%

+12.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.27%

14.61%

+13.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.85%

20.32%

+16.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.09%

31.44%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.23%

27.60%

+4.63%

CNXT vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNXT vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than FXI's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNXT
VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF
0.16%0.18%0.15%0.00%0.00%9.22%0.01%0.45%0.00%0.19%0.00%0.00%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
1.86%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNXT and FXI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNXT has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to FXI (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs FXI's -72.68%.

On 10-year performance, CNXT leads with 5.01% vs 2.81% for FXI. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 5.01% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

FXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.16% for CNXT.

CNXT tracks ChiNext Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 0.74% for FXI.

CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNXT and FXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer