CNXT vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
CNXT and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNXT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2014. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both CNXT and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNXT or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and VOO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CNXT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CNXT:
0.38
VOO:
2.04
CNXT:
1.00
VOO:
2.72
CNXT:
1.15
VOO:
1.38
CNXT:
0.31
VOO:
3.02
CNXT:
1.16
VOO:
13.60
CNXT:
17.82%
VOO:
1.88%
CNXT:
54.05%
VOO:
12.52%
CNXT:
-68.98%
VOO:
-33.99%
CNXT:
-52.17%
VOO:
-3.52%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 24.65% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 0.87%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.02% annualized return.
CNXT
16.89%
-2.85%
27.85%
23.89%
1.35%
0.87%
VOO
24.65%
-0.29%
7.63%
24.77%
14.57%
13.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNXT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNXT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNXT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CNXT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.23% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 0.92% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNXT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.56%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.