CNXT vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
CNXT and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNXT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the SME-ChiNext 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2014. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both CNXT and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CNXT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNXT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 3.20% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CNXT has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 3.87%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.14% annualized return.
CNXT
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 65.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 3.87%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNXT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNXT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
CNXT
VOO
CNXT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNXT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 1.01 | +1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 1.53 | +1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.23 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 1.55 | +2.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 7.31 | +6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNXT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.01 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.71 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.79 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.83 | -0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and VOO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CNXT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.98% | -33.99% | -34.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -11.98% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | -24.52% | -36.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.30% | -33.99% | -29.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.37% | -5.55% | -18.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.41% | -3.72% | -39.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 2.55% | +2.18% |
Volatility
CNXT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that CNXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNXT | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 5.34% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.80% | 9.47% | +10.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.89% | 18.11% | +13.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.92% | 16.82% | +18.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.54% | 17.99% | +13.55% |