CNXT vs. CWEB
CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) and CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CNXT is a China Equities fund tracking the SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while CWEB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNXT returned 5.56%/yr vs -44.79%/yr for CWEB. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CWEB.
Performance
CNXT vs. CWEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 42.18% return, which is significantly higher than CWEB's -49.71% return.
CNXT
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 12.07%
- YTD
- 42.18%
- 6M
- 40.51%
- 1Y
- 133.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
CWEB
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- -14.35%
- YTD
- -49.71%
- 6M
- -51.73%
- 1Y
- -44.54%
- 3Y*
- -14.65%
- 5Y*
- -44.79%
- 10Y*
- —
CNXT vs. CWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 42.18% | 59.31% | 12.42% | -21.47% | -35.58% | 8.78% | 63.30% | 42.66% | -39.48% | 20.19% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -49.71% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNXT and CWEB is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CNXT and CWEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
CNXT vs. CWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CNXT
CWEB
Industrials
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
CNXT
CWEB
-
Technology
CNXT
CWEB
Basic Materials
CNXT
CWEB
-
Healthcare
CNXT
CWEB
Financial Services
CNXT
CWEB
Consumer Defensive
CNXT
CWEB
Communication Services
CNXT
CWEB
Consumer Cyclical
CNXT
CWEB
Energy
CNXT
-
CWEB
-
Real Estate
CNXT
-
CWEB
Utilities
CNXT
-
CWEB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNXT vs. CWEB — Risk / Return Rank
CNXT
CWEB
CNXT vs. CWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNXT | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 0.87 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.00 | -0.68 | +11.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.51 | -1.29 | +33.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNXT vs. CWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, smaller than the maximum CWEB drawdown of -98.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and CWEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNXT | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.98% | -98.09% | +29.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -65.54% | +53.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.60% | -65.54% | +16.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.21% | -95.63% | +34.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -97.95% | +97.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.78% | -65.63% | +22.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 34.57% | -30.45% |
Volatility
CNXT vs. CWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is 11.81%, while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that CNXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNXT | CWEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 16.25% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.89% | 40.73% | -18.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.03% | 54.19% | -22.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.48% | 94.56% | -59.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.76% | 80.55% | -48.79% |
CNXT vs. CWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CWEB's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNXT vs. CWEB - Dividend Comparison
CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than CWEB's 6.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.22% | 0.01% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.19% |
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.71% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNXT and CWEB have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to CNXT (11.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs CWEB's -98.09%.
On 5-year performance, CNXT leads with 5.56% vs -44.79% for CWEB. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CNXT has been the lower-risk option at 11.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 5.56% return vs -44.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.71%, compared with 0.13% for CNXT.
CNXT is categorized as China Equities, while CWEB is Leveraged Equities. CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 1.30% for CWEB.
CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNXT and CWEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer