CNXT vs. CWEB

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CNXT (VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF) and CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) are both China Equities funds - CNXT tracks the SME-ChiNext 100 Index while CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNXT returned 1.56%/yr vs -42.28%/yr for CWEB. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CNXT charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CWEB.

Performance

CNXT vs. CWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNXT achieves a 20.68% return, which is significantly higher than CWEB's -45.40% return.

CNXT

• 1D: -4.22%
• 1M: -3.05%
• 6M: 10.97%
• YTD: 20.68%
• 1Y: 79.99%
• 3Y*: 22.79%
• 5Y*: 1.56%
• 10Y*: 5.41%

CWEB

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -3.29%
• 6M: -54.85%
• YTD: -45.40%
• 1Y: -41.53%
• 3Y*: -16.96%
• 5Y*: -42.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNXT vs. CWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	20.68%	59.31%	12.42%	-21.47%	-35.58%	8.78%	63.30%	42.66%	-39.48%	20.19%
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares	-45.40%	29.04%	0.12%	-32.85%	-59.43%	-79.35%	116.38%	51.24%	-63.01%	166.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CNXT and CWEB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016	0.55

The correlation between CNXT and CWEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

CNXT vs. CWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CNXT	CWEB
Technology	44.3%	4.0%
Industrials	37.5%	-
Basic Materials	4.9%	-
Healthcare	3.9%	6.0%
Financial Services	3.7%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	4.0%
Communication Services	0.9%	41.7%
Consumer Cyclical	0.6%	36.9%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	5.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CNXT vs. CWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNXT

CNXT Risk / Return Rank: 88
CNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

CWEB

CWEB Risk / Return Rank: 4
CWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNXT vs. CWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CNXT	CWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	-0.76	+3.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	-0.98	+3.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	0.89	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.23	-0.60	+5.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.67	-1.10	+18.76

CNXT vs. CWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNXT Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the CWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNXT and CWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CNXT vs. CWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNXT drawdown since its inception was -68.98%, smaller than the maximum CWEB drawdown of -98.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNXT and CWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CNXT	CWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.98%	-98.18%	+29.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.37%	-69.36%	+53.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.60%	-69.36%	+20.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.21%	-94.78%	+33.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.37%	-97.78%	+82.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.61%	-65.82%	+23.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	37.85%	-33.31%

Volatility

CNXT vs. CWEB - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF (CNXT) and Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) have volatilities of 15.65% and 15.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CNXT	CWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.65%	15.57%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.28%	41.03%	-15.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.35%	55.12%	-20.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.85%	94.34%	-58.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.98%	80.43%	-48.45%

CNXT vs. CWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CWEB's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CNXT vs. CWEB - Dividend Comparison

CNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than CWEB's 6.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CNXT VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC SME-ChiNext ETF	0.15%	0.18%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	9.22%	0.01%	0.45%	0.00%	0.19%
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares	6.65%	2.77%	4.59%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%	1.59%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CNXT and CWEB in my portfolio?

CNXT and CWEB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CNXT or CWEB?

CNXT has higher volatility (15.65%) compared to CWEB (15.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNXT dropped -68.98% vs CWEB's -98.18%.

Which ETF is better, CNXT or CWEB?

On 5-year performance, CNXT leads with 1.56% vs -42.28% for CWEB. On fees, CNXT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CNXT or CWEB?

Over the 5-year period, CNXT has performed better with a 1.56% return vs -42.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CNXT or CWEB?

CNXT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CNXT or CWEB?

CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 0.15% for CNXT.

What is the main difference between CNXT and CWEB?

CNXT tracks SME-ChiNext 100 Index, while CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CNXT and 1.30% for CWEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.