FLAX vs. FLKR
FLAX (Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Franklin Templeton - FLAX tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index while FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAX returned 7.95%/yr vs 19.48%/yr for FLKR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLAX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
FLAX vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 29.31% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 114.41% return.
FLAX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 29.31%
- 6M
- 32.11%
- 1Y
- 58.93%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 29.00%
- YTD
- 114.41%
- 6M
- 130.14%
- 1Y
- 238.40%
- 3Y*
- 51.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FLAX vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | 29.31% | 33.72% | 9.82% | 6.27% | -18.88% | -3.54% | 24.17% | 17.19% | -12.02% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 114.41% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 19.16% | -27.50% | -7.54% | 42.64% | 8.88% | -15.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLAX and FLKR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FLAX and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLAX vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLAX
FLKR
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
FLAX
FLKR
Financial Services
FLAX
FLKR
Consumer Cyclical
FLAX
FLKR
Industrials
FLAX
FLKR
Communication Services
FLAX
FLKR
Basic Materials
FLAX
FLKR
Healthcare
FLAX
FLKR
Energy
FLAX
FLKR
Consumer Defensive
FLAX
FLKR
Utilities
FLAX
FLKR
Real Estate
FLAX
FLKR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLAX vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
FLAX
FLKR
FLAX vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLAX | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.73 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 10.42 | -5.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.96 | 38.67 | -20.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLAX | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11 | 5.83 | -2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.69 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.55 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
FLAX vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLAX | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.51% | -50.06% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.99% | -23.03% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.29% | -26.39% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.75% | -49.51% | +10.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -1.77% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.41% | -22.07% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 6.20% | -2.91% |
Volatility
FLAX vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) is 8.58%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that FLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLAX | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 20.21% | -11.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.54% | 36.52% | -19.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.07% | 41.18% | -22.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 28.19% | -9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 27.56% | -7.63% |
FLAX vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLAX vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FLKR's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | 1.83% | 2.37% | 3.12% | 2.20% | 2.86% | 2.38% | 1.57% | 2.23% | 2.35% | 0.00% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.80% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLAX and FLKR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to FLAX (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 7.95% for FLAX. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAX has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLAX.
FLAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.
FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLAX and 0.09% for FLKR.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLAX and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer