PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAX vs. FLKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAX vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 29.31% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 114.41% return.


FLAX

1D
-1.11%
1M
10.05%
YTD
29.31%
6M
32.11%
1Y
58.93%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*

FLKR

1D
-0.79%
1M
29.00%
YTD
114.41%
6M
130.14%
1Y
238.40%
3Y*
51.14%
5Y*
19.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAX vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
29.31%33.72%9.82%6.27%-18.88%-3.54%24.17%17.19%-12.02%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
114.41%91.91%-18.84%19.16%-27.50%-7.54%42.64%8.88%-15.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and FLKR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.76

The correlation between FLAX and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLAX vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLAX
FLKR

Technology

39.7%
64.3%

Financial Services

17.2%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
6.0%

Industrials

9.2%
12.8%

Communication Services

6.5%
1.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
2.6%

Healthcare

3.3%
2.5%

Energy

3.0%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
1.5%

Utilities

2.1%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Technology

FLAX
39.7%
FLKR
64.3%

Financial Services

FLAX
17.2%
FLKR
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FLAX
10.2%
FLKR
6.0%

Industrials

FLAX
9.2%
FLKR
12.8%

Communication Services

FLAX
6.5%
FLKR
1.6%

Basic Materials

FLAX
4.2%
FLKR
2.6%

Healthcare

FLAX
3.3%
FLKR
2.5%

Energy

FLAX
3.0%
FLKR
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLAX
2.8%
FLKR
1.5%

Utilities

FLAX
2.1%
FLKR
0.3%

Real Estate

FLAX
2.0%
FLKR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAX vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAX
FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FLKR
FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAX vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAXFLKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.73

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

10.42

-5.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.96

38.67

-20.71

FLAX vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 5.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAXFLKRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

5.83

-2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.69

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.55

-0.11

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and FLKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAXFLKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.51%

-50.06%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-23.03%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-26.39%

+7.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.75%

-49.51%

+10.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.77%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.41%

-22.07%

+6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

6.20%

-2.91%

Volatility

FLAX vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) is 8.58%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that FLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAXFLKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

20.21%

-11.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.54%

36.52%

-19.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.07%

41.18%

-22.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

28.19%

-9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

27.56%

-7.63%

FLAX vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLAX vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than FLKR's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
1.83%2.37%3.12%2.20%2.86%2.38%1.57%2.23%2.35%0.00%
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
1.80%3.87%7.08%2.28%3.13%2.12%0.99%2.09%1.86%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAX and FLKR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLKR has higher volatility (20.21%) compared to FLAX (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 19.48% vs 7.95% for FLAX. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAX has been the lower-risk option at 8.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 7.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLAX.

FLAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.80% for FLKR.

FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLAX and 0.09% for FLKR.

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.83 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAX and FLKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer