FKRCX vs. FKDNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FKRCX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund) and FKDNX (Franklin DynaTech Fund) are both mutual funds - FKRCX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKDNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, FKRCX returned 15.96%/yr vs 18.38%/yr for FKDNX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FKRCX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FKDNX.

Performance

FKRCX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKRCX achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FKRCX has underperformed FKDNX with an annualized return of 15.96%, while FKDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.38% annualized return.

FKRCX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 6.83%
• 6M: 19.04%
• 1Y: 85.44%
• 3Y*: 53.81%
• 5Y*: 21.74%
• 10Y*: 15.96%

FKDNX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 7.25%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 12.49%
• 1Y: 30.72%
• 3Y*: 25.84%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: 18.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKRCX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	6.83%	196.59%	17.64%	2.03%	-23.47%	-4.03%	44.30%	51.48%	-18.11%	-0.12%
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	13.49%	18.59%	30.57%	44.42%	-40.30%	12.53%	57.68%	36.36%	2.85%	39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FKRCX and FKDNX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1980	0.20

Return for Risk

FKRCX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKRCX

FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

FKDNX

FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 23
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKRCX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FKRCX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.55	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.07	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.27	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	1.54	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.91	4.79	+3.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FKRCX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKRCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKRCX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FKRCX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	1.55	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.44	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.75	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.67	-0.48

Drawdowns

FKRCX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKRCX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, which is greater than FKDNX's maximum drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKRCX and FKDNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKRCX	FKDNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.85%	-51.63%	-27.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.15%	-20.49%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.15%	-26.23%	-4.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.79%	-48.28%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.54%	-48.28%	-1.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.60%	0.00%	-20.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.74%	-11.25%	-22.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.07%	6.57%	+4.50%

Volatility

FKRCX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) at 4.76%. This indicates that FKRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKRCX	FKDNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.60%	4.76%	+8.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.14%	15.85%	+19.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.21%	20.38%	+21.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.82%	26.21%	+7.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.85%	24.61%	+8.24%

FKRCX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKRCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKRCX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

FKRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.06%, more than FKDNX's 9.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	9.84%	11.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.43%	0.00%	0.74%	2.92%	1.77%	3.55%	2.46%
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	10.06%	10.75%	13.44%	3.12%	0.00%	9.37%	10.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	8.73%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKRCX and FKDNX in my portfolio?

FKRCX and FKDNX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FKRCX or FKDNX?

FKRCX has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to FKDNX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKRCX dropped -78.85% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.