PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKRCX vs. FDGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKRCX achieves a -10.16% return, which is significantly lower than FDGFX's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FKRCX has underperformed FDGFX with an annualized return of 11.52%, while FDGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.72% annualized return.


FKRCX

1D
3.29%
1M
-4.25%
6M
-18.81%
YTD
-10.16%
1Y
65.72%
3Y*
45.65%
5Y*
19.47%
10Y*
11.52%
ALL TIME*
6.74%

FDGFX

1D
2.02%
1M
0.21%
6M
10.28%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
24.08%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
13.72%
ALL TIME*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
-10.16%196.59%17.64%2.03%-23.47%-4.03%44.30%51.48%-18.11%-0.12%
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
15.73%22.48%27.58%17.86%-11.61%27.96%2.20%28.75%-7.23%18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FKRCX and FDGFX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 1995

0.25

Over the past year, FKRCX and FDGFX have become more correlated (0.46) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKRCX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FDGFX
FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKRCXFDGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.69

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

11.15

-7.18

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKRCX and FDGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKRCX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, which is greater than FDGFX's maximum drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKRCX and FDGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKRCXFDGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.85%

-60.77%

-18.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.40%

-10.16%

-27.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.40%

-21.37%

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.79%

-21.37%

-27.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-41.29%

-8.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.23%

-2.36%

-30.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-7.50%

-26.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.69%

2.44%

+14.25%

Volatility

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a higher volatility of 13.21% compared to Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) at 4.07%. This indicates that FKRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKRCXFDGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.21%

4.07%

+9.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.56%

12.23%

+26.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.97%

15.04%

+30.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.78%

16.79%

+17.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.22%

19.27%

+13.95%

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKRCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

FKRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.96%, more than FDGFX's 8.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGFX
Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund
8.41%9.35%9.81%3.48%11.46%7.81%1.89%4.84%22.93%15.35%1.58%8.44%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
11.96%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKRCX and FDGFX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKRCX has higher volatility (13.21%) compared to FDGFX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKRCX dropped -78.85% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKRCX and FDGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer