FKRCX vs. FDGFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FKRCX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund) and FDGFX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FKRCX is a Gold fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FDGFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FKRCX returned 14.64%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for FDGFX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FKRCX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FDGFX.

Performance

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKRCX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than FDGFX's 18.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FKRCX having a 14.64% annualized return and FDGFX not far behind at 14.40%.

FKRCX

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: -2.88%
• YTD: -0.48%
• 6M: -3.35%
• 1Y: 78.76%
• 3Y*: 50.97%
• 5Y*: 22.35%
• 10Y*: 14.64%

FDGFX

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 18.52%
• 6M: 18.30%
• 1Y: 40.44%
• 3Y*: 26.77%
• 5Y*: 16.80%
• 10Y*: 14.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	-0.48%	196.59%	17.64%	2.03%	-23.47%	-4.03%	44.30%	51.48%	-18.11%	-0.12%
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	18.52%	22.48%	27.58%	17.86%	-11.61%	27.96%	2.20%	28.75%	-7.23%	18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FKRCX and FDGFX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 1995	0.25

The correlation between FKRCX and FDGFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FKRCX vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKRCX

FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

FDGFX

FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FKRCX	FDGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	2.76	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	3.63	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.49	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	3.94	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.97	17.31	-11.33

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKRCX and FDGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKRCX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, which is greater than FDGFX's maximum drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKRCX and FDGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKRCX	FDGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.85%	-60.77%	-18.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.78%	-10.16%	-24.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.78%	-21.37%	-13.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.79%	-21.37%	-27.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.54%	-41.29%	-8.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.03%	0.00%	-26.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.73%	-7.51%	-26.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.50%	2.31%	+10.19%

Volatility

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a higher volatility of 16.62% compared to Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) at 6.07%. This indicates that FKRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKRCX	FDGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.62%	6.07%	+10.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.79%	11.80%	+25.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.22%	14.48%	+29.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.29%	16.75%	+17.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.11%	19.29%	+13.82%

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKRCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKRCX vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

FKRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%, more than FDGFX's 8.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	8.05%	9.35%	9.81%	3.48%	11.46%	7.81%	1.89%	4.84%	22.93%	15.35%	1.58%	8.44%
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	10.80%	10.75%	13.44%	3.12%	0.00%	9.37%	10.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	8.73%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKRCX and FDGFX in my portfolio?

FKRCX and FDGFX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FKRCX or FDGFX?

FKRCX has higher volatility (16.62%) compared to FDGFX (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKRCX dropped -78.85% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.