FKDNX vs. FADTX

In the year-to-date period, FKDNX achieves a -5.49% return, which is significantly higher than FADTX's -10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FKDNX has outperformed FADTX with an annualized return of 12.97%, while FADTX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.81% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FADTX's 0.97% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FKDNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the FADTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKDNX and FADTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FKDNX nor FADTX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FKDNX drawdown since its inception was -55.85%, smaller than the maximum FADTX drawdown of -82.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKDNX and FADTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) is 9.42%, while Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that FKDNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FADTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.