FKDNX vs. FADTX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX).

FKDNX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 2, 1968. FADTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.

Performance

FKDNX vs. FADTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FKDNX vs. FADTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	-10.96%	18.59%	30.57%	44.42%	-40.30%	12.53%	57.68%	36.36%	2.85%	39.29%
FADTX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A	0.00%	24.35%	35.02%	59.29%	-36.17%	27.26%	63.93%	50.57%	-8.52%	49.42%

Returns By Period

FKDNX

• 1D: 5.05%
• 1M: -5.14%
• YTD: -10.96%
• 6M: -11.72%
• 1Y: 19.43%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: 5.93%
• 10Y*: 15.95%

FADTX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKDNX vs. FADTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKDNX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FADTX's 0.97% expense ratio.

FADTX

Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A

FKDNX

Franklin DynaTech Fund

Return for Risk

FKDNX vs. FADTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKDNX

FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKDNX vs. FADTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A (FADTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FKDNX	FADTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.63	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FKDNX	FADTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between FKDNX and FADTX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FKDNX vs. FADTX - Dividend Comparison

FKDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.54%, more than FADTX's 11.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	12.54%	11.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.43%	0.00%	0.74%	2.92%	1.77%	3.55%	2.46%
FADTX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class A	11.13%	11.13%	8.01%	3.94%	3.72%	12.63%	7.85%	2.52%	23.98%	8.23%	1.63%	4.55%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FKDNX	FADTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.48%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.28%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FKDNX	FADTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.47%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.27%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.53%	—	—