FKRCX vs. GC=F
FKRCX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund) is Gold fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FKRCX vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FKRCX
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -5.57%
- 1Y
- 74.96%
- 3Y*
- 52.41%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.12%
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FKRCX vs. GC=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund | -1.84% | 196.59% | 17.64% | 2.03% | -15.43% |
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between FKRCX and GC=F is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FKRCX vs. GC=F — Risk / Return Rank
FKRCX
GC=F
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FKRCX vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Gold Futures (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FKRCX | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FKRCX vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FKRCX | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.05% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.73% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.61% | — | — |
Volatility
FKRCX vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FKRCX | GC=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.23% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.31% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.13% | — | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
FKRCX and GC=F have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FKRCX and GC=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer