FITZ vs. LRNZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for LRNZ.

Performance

FITZ vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FITZ

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRNZ

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: 29.38%
• YTD: 29.07%
• 6M: 29.15%
• 1Y: 45.73%
• 3Y*: 24.70%
• 5Y*: 8.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITZ vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-1.46%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FITZ and LRNZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

FITZ vs. LRNZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRNZ

LRNZ Risk / Return Rank: 40
LRNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LRNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
LRNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LRNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
LRNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITZ vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FITZ	LRNZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-6.98	0.41	-7.39

Drawdowns

FITZ vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -1.77%, smaller than the maximum LRNZ drawdown of -61.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and LRNZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITZ	LRNZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	-61.33%	+59.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-26.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-61.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-3.94%	+2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.86%	-26.65%	+25.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FITZ	LRNZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.00%	28.90%	-18.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.00%	37.26%	-27.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.00%	37.63%	-27.63%

FITZ vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITZ vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FITZ nor LRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITZ and LRNZ in my portfolio?

FITZ and LRNZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FITZ or LRNZ?

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FITZ or LRNZ?

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FITZ or LRNZ?

FITZ and LRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FITZ and LRNZ?

They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and TrueMark Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.68% for LRNZ.