PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITZ vs. BLOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITZ vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FITZ

1D
-0.95%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLOX

1D
-2.56%
1M
10.59%
YTD
16.52%
6M
5.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITZ vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FITZ and BLOX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITZ vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FITZ vs. BLOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FITZBLOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-6.98

0.54

-7.52

Drawdowns

FITZ vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -1.77%, smaller than the maximum BLOX drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and BLOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITZBLOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-47.09%

+45.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-19.45%

+17.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-18.53%

+17.67%

Volatility

FITZ vs. BLOX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITZBLOXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.00%

53.44%

-43.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.00%

53.44%

-43.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.00%

53.44%

-43.44%

FITZ vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FITZ vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison

FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.81%.


PositionTTM2025
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
36.81%22.69%
FITZ
Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FITZ and BLOX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 36.81%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

FITZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BLOX is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 1.03% for BLOX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITZ and BLOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer