FITZ vs. BHDG
FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and BHDG (Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FITZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nicholas, while BHDG is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for BHDG.
Performance
FITZ vs. BHDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FITZ
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BHDG
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FITZ vs. BHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -5.35% |
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF | 9.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITZ and BHDG is -0.61, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITZ vs. BHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FITZ vs. BHDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -6.70%, smaller than the maximum BHDG drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and BHDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITZ | BHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.70% | -15.06% | +8.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.70% | -3.89% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -8.62% | +4.82% |
Volatility
FITZ vs. BHDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITZ | BHDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.29% | 27.77% | -10.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 27.77% | -10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 27.77% | -10.48% |
FITZ vs. BHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BHDG's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITZ vs. BHDG - Dividend Comparison
Neither FITZ nor BHDG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FITZ and BHDG have a correlation of -0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BHDG.
FITZ and BHDG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FITZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BHDG is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.97% for BHDG.
Find the right allocation for FITZ and BHDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer