FITZ vs. BHDG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) and BHDG (Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FITZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nicholas, while BHDG is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Nicholas. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. FITZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for BHDG.

Performance

FITZ vs. BHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FITZ

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BHDG

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITZ vs. BHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-1.46%
BHDG Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF	4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FITZ and BHDG is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.40

Return for Risk

FITZ vs. BHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ) and Nicholas Bitcoin Tail ETF (BHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FITZ	BHDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-6.98	-0.91	-6.08

Drawdowns

FITZ vs. BHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITZ drawdown since its inception was -1.77%, smaller than the maximum BHDG drawdown of -15.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITZ and BHDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITZ	BHDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.77%	-15.06%	+13.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-7.70%	+5.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.86%	-9.28%	+8.42%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FITZ	BHDG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.00%	18.70%	-8.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.00%	18.70%	-8.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.00%	18.70%	-8.70%

FITZ vs. BHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BHDG's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITZ vs. BHDG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FITZ nor BHDG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITZ and BHDG in my portfolio?

FITZ and BHDG have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FITZ or BHDG?

On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FITZ or BHDG?

FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for BHDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FITZ or BHDG?

FITZ and BHDG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FITZ and BHDG?

FITZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BHDG is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FITZ and 0.97% for BHDG.