FFFCX vs. FLTR
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR).
FFFCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 17, 1996. FLTR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. It was launched on Apr 25, 2011.
Performance
FFFCX vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFFCX vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | -0.61% | 11.39% | 5.26% | 9.82% | -13.21% | 5.64% | 11.09% | 14.34% | -3.74% | 12.48% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 0.71% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | 0.30% | 2.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFFCX achieves a -0.61% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFCX has outperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 5.40%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.46% annualized return.
FFFCX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 8.45%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 5.40%
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- 3.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFFCX vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFFCX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFFCX vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
FFFCX
FLTR
FFFCX vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFFCX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | 2.10 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.14 | 2.43 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.93 | -0.61 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 2.47 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | 18.16 | -9.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFFCX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.10 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 2.01 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.69 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.51 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFFCX and FLTR is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FFFCX vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
FFFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than FLTR's 4.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 5.00% | 4.97% | 2.99% | 2.72% | 7.23% | 9.33% | 6.01% | 5.78% | 6.98% | 4.82% | 3.22% | 3.68% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.89% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
Drawdowns
FFFCX vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFFCX drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFCX and FLTR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFFCX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.88% | -17.84% | -19.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.00% | -1.93% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.35% | -3.06% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.35% | -17.84% | -0.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -0.12% | -3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -0.68% | -3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.26% | +0.74% |
Volatility
FFFCX vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.40%. This indicates that FFFCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFFCX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 0.40% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.42% | 0.57% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.49% | 2.25% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.32% | 2.14% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.27% | 5.01% | +1.26% |