PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FFFCX vs. FLPSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FFFCX and FLPSX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

FFFCX vs. FLPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.19%
-8.77%
FFFCX
FLPSX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FFFCX:

1.32

FLPSX:

-0.21

Sortino Ratio

FFFCX:

1.91

FLPSX:

-0.17

Omega Ratio

FFFCX:

1.24

FLPSX:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

FFFCX:

0.54

FLPSX:

-0.12

Martin Ratio

FFFCX:

5.58

FLPSX:

-0.44

Ulcer Index

FFFCX:

1.26%

FLPSX:

7.36%

Daily Std Dev

FFFCX:

5.31%

FLPSX:

15.32%

Max Drawdown

FFFCX:

-33.54%

FLPSX:

-52.90%

Current Drawdown

FFFCX:

-6.13%

FLPSX:

-24.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFCX achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than FLPSX's 2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFCX has outperformed FLPSX with an annualized return of 1.41%, while FLPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.19% annualized return.


FFFCX

YTD

1.51%

1M

1.51%

6M

2.19%

1Y

6.30%

5Y*

0.54%

10Y*

1.41%

FLPSX

YTD

2.94%

1M

2.94%

6M

-8.77%

1Y

-2.88%

5Y*

-0.99%

10Y*

0.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFFCX vs. FLPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFCX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FLPSX's 0.82% expense ratio.


FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
Expense ratio chart for FLPSX: current value at 0.82% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.82%
Expense ratio chart for FFFCX: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FFFCX vs. FLPSX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFCX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFFCX is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFFCX is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFFCX is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFFCX is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFFCX is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFFCX is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FLPSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLPSX is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLPSX is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLPSX is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLPSX is 33
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLPSX is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLPSX is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FFFCX vs. FLPSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFFCX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.32-0.21
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFFCX, currently valued at 1.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.91-0.17
The chart of Omega ratio for FFFCX, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.240.97
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFFCX, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.54-0.12
The chart of Martin ratio for FFFCX, currently valued at 5.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.005.58-0.44
FFFCX
FLPSX

The current FFFCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the FLPSX Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFCX and FLPSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.32
-0.21
FFFCX
FLPSX

Dividends

FFFCX vs. FLPSX - Dividend Comparison

FFFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than FLPSX's 2.05% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
2.94%2.99%2.72%3.34%2.50%1.20%1.97%2.06%1.46%1.75%4.05%6.17%
FLPSX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund
2.05%2.11%2.02%1.20%1.54%1.77%1.77%1.94%1.45%1.20%5.15%6.91%

Drawdowns

FFFCX vs. FLPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFCX drawdown since its inception was -33.54%, smaller than the maximum FLPSX drawdown of -52.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFCX and FLPSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-6.13%
-24.97%
FFFCX
FLPSX

Volatility

FFFCX vs. FLPSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) is 1.57%, while Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund (FLPSX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that FFFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.57%
3.41%
FFFCX
FLPSX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab