PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFCX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFCX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFCX achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FFFCX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 5.89%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.31% annualized return.


FFFCX

1D
0.65%
1M
1.38%
YTD
5.54%
6M
5.67%
1Y
12.35%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
5.89%

VTI

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.55%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.59%
1Y
27.18%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFCX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
5.54%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%11.09%14.34%-3.74%12.48%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.35%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFCX and VTI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2001

0.89

The correlation between FFFCX and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (3 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFCX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFCX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFFCXVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.38

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.06

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.23

13.68

-0.45

FFFCX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFCX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFFCX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFCX drawdown since its inception was -36.88%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFCX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFCXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.88%

-55.45%

+18.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-8.92%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.83%

-19.30%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.35%

-25.36%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.35%

-35.00%

+16.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.48%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-8.01%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.99%

-1.05%

Volatility

FFFCX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) is 2.44%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that FFFCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFCXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

4.74%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

9.96%

-5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.36%

12.76%

-7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.45%

17.49%

-11.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

18.35%

-12.03%

FFFCX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFCX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFCX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FFFCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than VTI's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.65%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFFCX and VTI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to FFFCX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFCX dropped -36.88% vs VTI's -55.45%.

FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFCX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer