PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRR vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRR vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return.


FDRR

1D
-0.99%
1M
6.39%
YTD
10.01%
6M
10.38%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*

ILCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.29%
YTD
11.12%
6M
11.10%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRR vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
10.01%21.70%20.24%13.66%-9.73%26.06%8.23%26.86%-3.60%19.29%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and ILCB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.92

The correlation between FDRR and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDRR vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDRR
ILCB

Technology

34.5%
35.5%

Financial Services

12.0%
11.7%

Communication Services

10.7%
11.4%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
10.1%

Industrials

8.7%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.8%

Utilities

2.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.8%

Technology

FDRR
34.5%
ILCB
35.5%

Financial Services

FDRR
12.0%
ILCB
11.7%

Communication Services

FDRR
10.7%
ILCB
11.4%

Healthcare

FDRR
9.4%
ILCB
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDRR
8.7%
ILCB
10.1%

Industrials

FDRR
8.7%
ILCB
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDRR
4.8%
ILCB
4.8%

Energy

FDRR
3.6%
ILCB
3.5%

Real Estate

FDRR
2.9%
ILCB
1.8%

Utilities

FDRR
2.4%
ILCB
2.3%

Basic Materials

FDRR
2.2%
ILCB
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRR vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRR
FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRR vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDRRILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.42

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

3.10

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.70

14.24

+1.46

FDRR vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRRILCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.35

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.79

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.64

+0.18

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRRILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.52%

-51.53%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-9.09%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-19.05%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-25.47%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.67%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-6.24%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.97%

+0.03%

Volatility

FDRR vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that FDRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRRILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

2.88%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

9.10%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

12.02%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

17.13%

-2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

18.16%

-1.28%

FDRR vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRR vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than ILCB's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
2.10%2.21%2.61%2.93%2.75%2.09%2.85%2.89%3.20%2.89%0.61%0.00%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRR and ILCB have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDRR has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 13.45% vs 12.34% for FDRR. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDRR.

FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.97% for ILCB.

FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDRR and 0.03% for ILCB.

FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRR and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer