FDRR vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDRR returned 12.13%/yr vs 6.18%/yr for NOBL. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

FDRR vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 6.48% return.

FDRR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 26.53%
• 3Y*: 20.07%
• 5Y*: 12.13%
• 10Y*: —

NOBL

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: 8.50%
• 5Y*: 6.18%
• 10Y*: 9.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRR vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	7.87%	21.70%	20.24%	13.66%	-9.73%	26.06%	8.23%	26.86%	-3.60%	19.29%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	6.48%	6.84%	6.72%	8.09%	-6.52%	25.46%	8.35%	27.39%	-3.26%	21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and NOBL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between FDRR and NOBL has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDRR vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDRR	NOBL
Technology	38.2%	4.6%
Financial Services	11.3%	12.8%
Communication Services	10.1%	-
Healthcare	9.3%	10.2%
Industrials	8.3%	20.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	23.6%
Energy	3.2%	2.9%
Real Estate	2.8%	4.6%
Utilities	2.1%	5.7%
Basic Materials	2.0%	10.2%

Return for Risk

FDRR vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRR

FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 74
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 72

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 29
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRR vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDRR	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	1.10	+1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	1.67	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.19	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	1.38	+1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.81	3.50	+9.31

FDRR vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, roughly equal to the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRR	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.52%	-35.43%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.52%	-9.11%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.04%	-15.36%	-2.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-17.92%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.08%	-3.29%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-3.48%	-0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	3.58%	-1.50%

Volatility

FDRR vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that FDRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDRR	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	3.31%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	8.22%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.25%	11.52%	-0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	14.38%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	16.60%	+0.26%

FDRR vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDRR vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than NOBL's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	2.16%	2.21%	2.61%	2.93%	2.75%	2.09%	2.85%	2.89%	3.20%	2.89%	0.61%	0.00%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.06%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRR and NOBL in my portfolio?

FDRR and NOBL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDRR or NOBL?

FDRR has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

Which ETF is better, FDRR or NOBL?

On 5-year performance, FDRR leads with 12.13% vs 6.18% for NOBL. On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDRR or NOBL?

Over the 5-year period, FDRR has performed better with a 12.13% return vs 6.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRR or NOBL?

FDRR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRR or NOBL?

FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 2.06% for NOBL.

What is the main difference between FDRR and NOBL?

FDRR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDRR and 0.35% for NOBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.