FDRR vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
FDRR and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FDRR is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates. It was launched on Sep 12, 2016. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. Both FDRR and NOBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FDRR or NOBL.
Correlation
The correlation between FDRR and NOBL is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FDRR vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FDRR:
1.77
NOBL:
0.82
FDRR:
2.45
NOBL:
1.18
FDRR:
1.33
NOBL:
1.14
FDRR:
2.67
NOBL:
1.16
FDRR:
11.54
NOBL:
3.51
FDRR:
1.77%
NOBL:
2.42%
FDRR:
11.50%
NOBL:
10.36%
FDRR:
-36.52%
NOBL:
-35.43%
FDRR:
-4.32%
NOBL:
-7.32%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 7.14% return.
FDRR
19.29%
-1.99%
5.90%
19.47%
10.90%
N/A
NOBL
7.14%
-4.74%
4.29%
7.79%
8.08%
9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDRR vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FDRR vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FDRR vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than NOBL's 2.10% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 1.70% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.09% | 2.85% | 2.89% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.45% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
FDRR vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, roughly equal to the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and NOBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FDRR vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is 3.10%, while ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that FDRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.