FDRR vs. FDGFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and FDGFX (Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Fidelity. FDRR is passively managed, while FDGFX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDRR returned 12.27%/yr vs 16.80%/yr for FDGFX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FDGFX.

Performance

FDRR vs. FDGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than FDGFX's 18.52% return.

FDRR

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 27.62%
• 3Y*: 20.09%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: —

FDGFX

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 3.26%
• YTD: 18.52%
• 6M: 18.30%
• 1Y: 40.44%
• 3Y*: 26.77%
• 5Y*: 16.80%
• 10Y*: 14.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRR vs. FDGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	7.91%	21.70%	20.24%	13.66%	-9.73%	26.06%	8.23%	26.86%	-3.60%	19.29%
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	18.52%	22.48%	27.58%	17.86%	-11.61%	27.96%	2.20%	28.75%	-7.23%	18.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and FDGFX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016	0.90

The correlation between FDRR and FDGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDRR vs. FDGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRR

FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 76
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FDGFX

FDGFX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FDGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FDGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FDGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FDGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FDGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRR vs. FDGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDRR	FDGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.76	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	3.63	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.49	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	3.94	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.39	17.31	-3.91

FDRR vs. FDGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FDGFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and FDGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. FDGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, smaller than the maximum FDGFX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and FDGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRR	FDGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.52%	-60.77%	+24.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.52%	-10.16%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.04%	-21.37%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-21.37%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.03%	0.00%	-3.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-7.51%	+3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.31%	-0.24%

Volatility

FDRR vs. FDGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is 3.80%, while Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund (FDGFX) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that FDRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDRR	FDGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	6.07%	-2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	11.80%	-3.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.27%	14.48%	-3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	16.75%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	19.29%	-2.43%

FDRR vs. FDGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGFX's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDRR vs. FDGFX - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than FDGFX's 8.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDGFX Fidelity Dividend Growth Fund	8.05%	9.35%	9.81%	3.48%	11.46%	7.81%	1.89%	4.84%	22.93%	15.35%	1.58%	8.44%
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	2.16%	2.21%	2.61%	2.93%	2.75%	2.09%	2.85%	2.89%	3.20%	2.89%	0.61%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRR and FDGFX in my portfolio?

FDRR and FDGFX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDRR or FDGFX?

FDGFX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to FDRR (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs FDGFX's -60.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.