FDRR vs. SCHD
FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDRR returned 12.13%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FDRR vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return.
FDRR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
FDRR vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 7.87% | 21.70% | 20.24% | 13.66% | -9.73% | 26.06% | 8.23% | 26.86% | -3.60% | 19.29% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRR and SCHD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDRR and SCHD has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDRR vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDRR
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
FDRR
SCHD
Financial Services
FDRR
SCHD
Communication Services
FDRR
SCHD
Healthcare
FDRR
SCHD
Industrials
FDRR
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FDRR
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FDRR
SCHD
Energy
FDRR
SCHD
Real Estate
FDRR
SCHD
-
Utilities
FDRR
SCHD
Basic Materials
FDRR
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRR vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FDRR
SCHD
FDRR vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.40 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 5.35 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.81 | 12.94 | -0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRR vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -33.37% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -4.61% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -16.13% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -16.85% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -2.47% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -3.31% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 1.90% | +0.18% |
Volatility
FDRR vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that FDRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 3.58% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 7.73% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 11.07% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 14.36% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 16.71% | +0.15% |
FDRR vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FDRR vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates | 2.16% | 2.21% | 2.61% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 2.09% | 2.85% | 2.89% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 0.61% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRR and SCHD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDRR has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, FDRR leads with 12.13% vs 8.71% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDRR has performed better with a 12.13% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FDRR.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.16% for FDRR.
FDRR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDRR and 0.06% for SCHD.
FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDRR and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer