PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIV vs. UDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIV vs. UDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than UDIV's 14.99% return.


FDIV

1D
-0.85%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.52%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
-12.10%
5Y*
-8.67%
10Y*
-2.13%

UDIV

1D
-0.69%
1M
6.05%
YTD
14.99%
6M
14.91%
1Y
33.63%
3Y*
24.66%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIV vs. UDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
0.72%2.95%-37.35%6.78%-9.97%10.20%-2.84%15.78%-5.04%6.19%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
14.99%19.00%25.61%25.21%-15.00%19.66%5.54%24.60%-8.83%17.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIV and UDIV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016

0.53

The correlation between FDIV and UDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDIV vs. UDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIV
UDIV

Industrials

24.9%
5.8%

Financial Services

20.0%
11.3%

Healthcare

16.2%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
5.7%

Technology

8.9%
39.0%

Utilities

4.2%
3.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
0.8%

Energy

3.0%
3.7%

Communication Services

3.0%
10.7%

Real Estate

-

3.7%

Industrials

FDIV
24.9%
UDIV
5.8%

Financial Services

FDIV
20.0%
UDIV
11.3%

Healthcare

FDIV
16.2%
UDIV
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDIV
11.0%
UDIV
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

FDIV
9.0%
UDIV
5.7%

Technology

FDIV
8.9%
UDIV
39.0%

Utilities

FDIV
4.2%
UDIV
3.0%

Basic Materials

FDIV
4.0%
UDIV
0.8%

Energy

FDIV
3.0%
UDIV
3.7%

Communication Services

FDIV
3.0%
UDIV
10.7%

Real Estate

FDIV

-

UDIV
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIV vs. UDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIV
FDIV Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIV vs. UDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIVUDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.52

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

4.00

-3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

18.28

-15.72

FDIV vs. UDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the UDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIV and UDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIVUDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

2.83

-2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.91

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.74

-0.82

Drawdowns

FDIV vs. UDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, which is greater than UDIV's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and UDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIVUDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.90%

-35.21%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-8.44%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.64%

-19.19%

-26.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.90%

-23.18%

-24.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.90%

-35.21%

-12.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.05%

-0.69%

-37.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-4.64%

-6.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.84%

+1.17%

Volatility

FDIV vs. UDIV - Volatility Comparison

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) have volatilities of 2.99% and 2.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIVUDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

2.98%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

8.99%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

11.95%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

15.51%

+5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

16.27%

+1.27%

FDIV vs. UDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UDIV's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIV vs. UDIV - Dividend Comparison

FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than UDIV's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
2.89%2.95%4.12%4.63%3.81%3.79%4.17%3.93%5.13%3.81%3.84%4.13%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.40%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIV and UDIV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIV has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to UDIV (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs UDIV's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, UDIV leads with 14.04% vs -8.67% for FDIV. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 14.04% return vs -8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FDIV.

FDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 1.40% for UDIV.

They also come from different issuers: MarketDesk and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIV and 0.06% for UDIV.

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIV and UDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer