PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIV vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIV vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's 8.39% return.


FDIV

1D
-0.85%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.52%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
-12.10%
5Y*
-8.67%
10Y*
-2.13%

FDVV

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.44%
YTD
8.39%
6M
8.67%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIV vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
0.72%2.95%-37.35%6.78%-9.97%10.20%-2.84%15.78%-5.04%6.19%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
8.39%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIV and FDVV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.62

The correlation between FDIV and FDVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (5 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDIV vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIV
FDVV

Industrials

24.9%
3.4%

Financial Services

20.0%
17.0%

Healthcare

16.2%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
11.0%

Technology

8.9%
29.1%

Utilities

4.2%
8.7%

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Energy

3.0%

-

Communication Services

3.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Industrials

FDIV
24.9%
FDVV
3.4%

Financial Services

FDIV
20.0%
FDVV
17.0%

Healthcare

FDIV
16.2%
FDVV
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FDIV
11.0%
FDVV
13.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDIV
9.0%
FDVV
11.0%

Technology

FDIV
8.9%
FDVV
29.1%

Utilities

FDIV
4.2%
FDVV
8.7%

Basic Materials

FDIV
4.0%
FDVV

-

Energy

FDIV
3.0%
FDVV

-

Communication Services

FDIV
3.0%
FDVV
3.7%

Real Estate

FDIV

-

FDVV
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIV vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIV
FDIV Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIV vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIVFDVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

2.35

-1.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

3.28

-2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.43

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.53

-1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.56

10.54

-7.98

FDIV vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIV and FDVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIVFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

2.35

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.91

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.79

-0.87

Drawdowns

FDIV vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, which is greater than FDVV's maximum drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and FDVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIVFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.90%

-40.25%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-9.30%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.64%

-15.90%

-29.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.90%

-20.18%

-27.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.05%

-1.12%

-36.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-3.81%

-7.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.23%

+0.78%

Volatility

FDIV vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) have volatilities of 2.99% and 3.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIVFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.14%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

7.99%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

10.06%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

14.75%

+6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

17.00%

+0.54%

FDIV vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIV vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than FDVV's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
2.89%2.95%4.12%4.63%3.81%3.79%4.17%3.93%5.13%3.81%3.84%4.13%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
2.72%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIV and FDVV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDVV has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to FDIV (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs FDVV's -40.25%.

On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs -8.67% for FDIV. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs -8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FDIV.

FDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 2.72% for FDVV.

FDIV is categorized as Dividend, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: MarketDesk and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIV and 0.29% for FDVV.

FDVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIV and FDVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer