FDIV vs. DIV
FDIV (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both Dividend funds. FDIV is actively managed, while DIV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDIV returned -2.13%/yr vs 3.95%/yr for DIV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
FDIV vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 11.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIV has underperformed DIV with an annualized return of -2.13%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively higher 3.95% annualized return.
FDIV
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 7.68%
- 3Y*
- -12.10%
- 5Y*
- -8.67%
- 10Y*
- -2.13%
DIV
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 10.20%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.95%
FDIV vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | 0.72% | 2.95% | -37.35% | 6.78% | -9.97% | 10.20% | -2.84% | 15.78% | -5.04% | 6.19% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 11.63% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIV and DIV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014 | 0.54 |
The correlation between FDIV and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FDIV vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIV
DIV
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
FDIV
DIV
Financial Services
FDIV
DIV
Healthcare
FDIV
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
FDIV
DIV
Consumer Defensive
FDIV
DIV
Technology
FDIV
DIV
-
Utilities
FDIV
DIV
Basic Materials
FDIV
DIV
Energy
FDIV
DIV
Communication Services
FDIV
DIV
Real Estate
FDIV
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIV vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
FDIV
DIV
FDIV vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.40 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 2.02 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.76 | -1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | 7.79 | -5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.40 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.37 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.12 | 0.22 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.27 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
FDIV vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.90% | -52.74% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.01% | -5.23% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.64% | -12.33% | -33.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.90% | -21.14% | -26.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.90% | -52.74% | +4.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.05% | -3.20% | -34.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.15% | -7.03% | -4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.85% | +1.16% |
Volatility
FDIV vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) is 2.99%, while Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that FDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 3.18% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 7.11% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 10.36% | +2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 13.68% | +7.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 17.98% | -0.44% |
FDIV vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDIV vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than DIV's 7.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 7.36% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
FDIV MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF | 2.89% | 2.95% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.81% | 3.79% | 4.17% | 3.93% | 5.13% | 3.81% | 3.84% | 4.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIV and DIV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIV has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to FDIV (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, DIV leads with 3.95% vs -2.13% for FDIV. On fees, FDIV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DIV has performed better with a 3.95% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 2.89% for FDIV.
They also come from different issuers: MarketDesk and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIV and 0.45% for DIV.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDIV and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer