PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIV vs. DIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIV vs. DIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 11.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIV has underperformed DIV with an annualized return of -2.13%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively higher 3.95% annualized return.


FDIV

1D
-0.85%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.52%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
-12.10%
5Y*
-8.67%
10Y*
-2.13%

DIV

1D
-1.38%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
11.63%
6M
10.20%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIV vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
0.72%2.95%-37.35%6.78%-9.97%10.20%-2.84%15.78%-5.04%6.19%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
11.63%3.10%11.27%-1.73%-3.92%30.60%-22.85%14.50%-6.60%9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIV and DIV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.54

The correlation between FDIV and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDIV vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIV
DIV

Industrials

24.9%
11.5%

Financial Services

20.0%
3.9%

Healthcare

16.2%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
13.4%

Technology

8.9%

-

Utilities

4.2%
12.0%

Basic Materials

4.0%
4.6%

Energy

3.0%
21.5%

Communication Services

3.0%
6.3%

Real Estate

-

19.8%

Industrials

FDIV
24.9%
DIV
11.5%

Financial Services

FDIV
20.0%
DIV
3.9%

Healthcare

FDIV
16.2%
DIV
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDIV
11.0%
DIV
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDIV
9.0%
DIV
13.4%

Technology

FDIV
8.9%
DIV

-

Utilities

FDIV
4.2%
DIV
12.0%

Basic Materials

FDIV
4.0%
DIV
4.6%

Energy

FDIV
3.0%
DIV
21.5%

Communication Services

FDIV
3.0%
DIV
6.3%

Real Estate

FDIV

-

DIV
19.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIV vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIV
FDIV Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIV vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDIVDIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

1.40

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

2.02

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.76

-1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.56

7.79

-5.23

FDIV vs. DIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the DIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIV and DIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDIVDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

1.40

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.37

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

0.22

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.27

-0.35

Drawdowns

FDIV vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and DIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIVDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.90%

-52.74%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-5.23%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.64%

-12.33%

-33.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.90%

-21.14%

-26.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.90%

-52.74%

+4.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.05%

-3.20%

-34.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-7.03%

-4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.85%

+1.16%

Volatility

FDIV vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) is 2.99%, while Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that FDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIVDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.18%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.57%

7.11%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

10.36%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

13.68%

+7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

17.98%

-0.44%

FDIV vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIV vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison

FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than DIV's 7.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
7.36%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
2.89%2.95%4.12%4.63%3.81%3.79%4.17%3.93%5.13%3.81%3.84%4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIV and DIV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIV has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to FDIV (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs DIV's -52.74%.

On 10-year performance, DIV leads with 3.95% vs -2.13% for FDIV. On fees, FDIV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIV has performed better with a 3.95% return vs -2.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 2.89% for FDIV.

They also come from different issuers: MarketDesk and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FDIV and 0.45% for DIV.

DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIV and DIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer