PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIV vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIV vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIV achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly lower than FZROX's 9.94% return.


FDIV

1D
-0.60%
1M
-1.59%
6M
-0.05%
YTD
3.86%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
-11.15%
5Y*
-7.91%
10Y*
-1.98%
ALL TIME*
-1.05%

FZROX

1D
1.64%
1M
-0.73%
6M
8.29%
YTD
9.94%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.95M$1.06M$524.89K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FDIV vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
3.86%2.95%-37.35%6.78%-9.97%10.20%-2.84%15.78%-4.78%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
9.94%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIV and FZROX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.54

The correlation between FDIV and FZROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIV vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDIV
FDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDIV vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDIVFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.26

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

2.12

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.26

9.14

-5.89

FDIV vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIV Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIV and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIV vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.90%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIV and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDIVFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.90%

-34.96%

-12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-8.89%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.64%

-19.38%

-26.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.90%

-25.12%

-22.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.12%

-1.85%

-34.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-5.43%

-6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.06%

+0.98%

Volatility

FDIV vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF (FDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 3.43%. This indicates that FDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDIVFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.43%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

10.34%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

13.19%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.91%

17.54%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

20.04%

-2.64%

FDIV vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDIV vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than FZROX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIV
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Dividend ETF
2.38%2.95%4.12%4.63%3.81%3.79%4.17%3.93%5.13%3.81%3.84%4.13%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIV and FZROX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIV has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FZROX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIV dropped -47.90% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIV and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer