PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. XRLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. XRLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FDIS

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
13.68%

XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. XRLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.65%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and XRLV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between FDIS and XRLV has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDIS vs. XRLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIS
XRLV

Consumer Cyclical

96.9%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
15.3%

Technology

0.9%
5.6%

Industrials

0.8%
7.2%

Communication Services

0.2%
2.8%

Healthcare

0.1%
8.4%

Financial Services

0.1%
16.3%

Real Estate

0.1%
11.6%

Basic Materials

-

3.1%

Energy

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

21.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FDIS
96.9%
XRLV
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

FDIS
1.0%
XRLV
15.3%

Technology

FDIS
0.9%
XRLV
5.6%

Industrials

FDIS
0.8%
XRLV
7.2%

Communication Services

FDIS
0.2%
XRLV
2.8%

Healthcare

FDIS
0.1%
XRLV
8.4%

Financial Services

FDIS
0.1%
XRLV
16.3%

Real Estate

FDIS
0.1%
XRLV
11.6%

Basic Materials

FDIS

-

XRLV
3.1%

Energy

FDIS

-

XRLV
1.1%

Utilities

FDIS

-

XRLV
21.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. XRLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XRLV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. XRLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDISXRLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.00

FDIS vs. XRLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDISXRLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. XRLV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISXRLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

Volatility

FDIS vs. XRLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISXRLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

FDIS vs. XRLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XRLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDIS vs. XRLV - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than XRLV's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and XRLV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XRLV is S&P 500. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.25% for XRLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and XRLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer