FDIS vs. XRLV
FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) and XRLV (Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while XRLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDIS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XRLV.
Performance
FDIS vs. XRLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FDIS
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- 1Y
- 9.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
XRLV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDIS vs. XRLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -0.65% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF | 6.34% | 4.11% | 14.11% | 0.06% | -4.77% | 27.39% | 2.56% | 29.80% | -3.28% | 23.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDIS and XRLV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FDIS and XRLV has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FDIS vs. XRLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDIS
XRLV
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDIS
XRLV
Consumer Defensive
FDIS
XRLV
Technology
FDIS
XRLV
Industrials
FDIS
XRLV
Communication Services
FDIS
XRLV
Healthcare
FDIS
XRLV
Financial Services
FDIS
XRLV
Real Estate
FDIS
XRLV
Basic Materials
FDIS
-
XRLV
Energy
FDIS
-
XRLV
Utilities
FDIS
-
XRLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDIS vs. XRLV — Risk / Return Rank
FDIS
XRLV
FDIS vs. XRLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDIS | XRLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDIS | XRLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FDIS vs. XRLV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDIS | XRLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility
FDIS vs. XRLV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDIS | XRLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.37% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | — | — |
FDIS vs. XRLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XRLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FDIS vs. XRLV - Dividend Comparison
FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than XRLV's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF | 1.53% | 2.15% | 1.94% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.26% | 1.65% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.39% | 1.71% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDIS and XRLV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.
XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.
FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XRLV is S&P 500. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.25% for XRLV.
Find the right allocation for FDIS and XRLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer