PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. XRLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDIS vs. XRLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDIS vs. XRLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-8.53%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%

Returns By Period


FDIS

1D
3.28%
1M
-6.32%
YTD
-8.53%
6M
-9.00%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
12.66%

XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDIS vs. XRLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XRLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. XRLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XRLV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. XRLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDISXRLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.36

FDIS vs. XRLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDISXRLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and XRLV is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FDIS vs. XRLV - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than XRLV's 1.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.79%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.86%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. XRLV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISXRLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

Volatility

FDIS vs. XRLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDISXRLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%