PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRLV vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRLV vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYG

1D
-0.98%
1M
7.38%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.57%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
13.75%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and SPYG is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2015

0.62

The correlation between XRLV and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRLV vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRLV
SPYG

Utilities

21.5%
1.2%

Financial Services

16.3%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

15.3%
1.0%

Real Estate

11.6%
0.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
5.8%

Industrials

7.2%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
8.9%

Technology

5.6%
51.9%

Basic Materials

3.1%
0.3%

Communication Services

2.8%
16.8%

Energy

1.1%
0.1%

Utilities

XRLV
21.5%
SPYG
1.2%

Financial Services

XRLV
16.3%
SPYG
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

XRLV
15.3%
SPYG
1.0%

Real Estate

XRLV
11.6%
SPYG
0.6%

Healthcare

XRLV
8.4%
SPYG
5.8%

Industrials

XRLV
7.2%
SPYG
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XRLV
7.1%
SPYG
8.9%

Technology

XRLV
5.6%
SPYG
51.9%

Basic Materials

XRLV
3.1%
SPYG
0.3%

Communication Services

XRLV
2.8%
SPYG
16.8%

Energy

XRLV
1.1%
SPYG
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRLV vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRLV

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRLV vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRLVSPYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRLVSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

Volatility

XRLV vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRLVSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.64%

XRLV vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRLV vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.47%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRLV and SPYG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.04% for SPYG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRLV and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer