XRLV vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XRLV (Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index, while BDGS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bridges. XRLV is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

XRLV vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XRLV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 14.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRLV vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF	6.34%	4.11%	14.11%	0.39%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.64%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XRLV and BDGS is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.20

The correlation between XRLV and BDGS shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRLV vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRLV	BDGS
Utilities	21.5%	1.9%
Financial Services	16.3%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	15.3%	4.1%
Real Estate	11.6%	1.5%
Healthcare	8.4%	7.5%
Industrials	7.2%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.1%	10.9%
Technology	5.6%	37.4%
Basic Materials	3.1%	1.5%
Communication Services	2.8%	16.6%
Energy	1.1%	2.6%

Return for Risk

XRLV vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRLV vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XRLV	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.76	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	XRLV	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-9.12%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.83%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.64%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRLV	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.08%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	8.21%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	8.21%	—

XRLV vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRLV vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF	1.53%	2.15%	1.94%	2.57%	1.96%	1.26%	1.65%	1.66%	1.76%	1.39%	1.71%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRLV and BDGS in my portfolio?

XRLV and BDGS have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRLV or BDGS?

On fees, XRLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRLV or BDGS?

XRLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRLV or BDGS?

XRLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between XRLV and BDGS?

XRLV is categorized as S&P 500, while BDGS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XRLV and 0.87% for BDGS.