PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XRLV vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XRLV vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.80%
12.78%
XRLV
BDGS

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRLV achieves a 18.42% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 16.97% return.


XRLV

YTD

18.42%

1M

-0.07%

6M

11.81%

1Y

22.67%

5Y (annualized)

8.81%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

BDGS

YTD

16.97%

1M

2.73%

6M

12.79%

1Y

17.89%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


XRLVBDGS
Sharpe Ratio2.544.24
Sortino Ratio3.568.14
Omega Ratio1.462.57
Calmar Ratio2.837.82
Martin Ratio16.1646.82
Ulcer Index1.41%0.40%
Daily Std Dev8.95%4.40%
Max Drawdown-38.31%-5.38%
Current Drawdown-0.78%-0.75%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XRLV vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for XRLV: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between XRLV and BDGS is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XRLV vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XRLV, currently valued at 2.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.544.24
The chart of Sortino ratio for XRLV, currently valued at 3.56, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.568.14
The chart of Omega ratio for XRLV, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.462.57
The chart of Calmar ratio for XRLV, currently valued at 4.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.517.82
The chart of Martin ratio for XRLV, currently valued at 16.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0016.1646.82
XRLV
BDGS

The current XRLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 4.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRLV and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.54
4.24
XRLV
BDGS

Dividends

XRLV vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than BDGS's 0.72% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.91%2.56%1.96%1.26%1.66%1.66%1.76%1.40%1.71%1.07%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.72%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XRLV vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRLV drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRLV and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.78%
-0.75%
XRLV
BDGS

Volatility

XRLV vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 2.48%. This indicates that XRLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.90%
2.48%
XRLV
BDGS