XRLV vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
XRLV and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XRLV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2015. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Performance
XRLV vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XRLV vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF | 6.34% | 4.11% | 14.11% | 0.39% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | -1.41% | 10.61% | 19.07% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
XRLV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XRLV vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XRLV vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
XRLV
BDGS
XRLV vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRLV | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.51 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between XRLV and BDGS is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XRLV vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
XRLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRLV Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF | 1.86% | 2.15% | 1.94% | 2.57% | 1.96% | 1.26% | 1.65% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.39% | 1.71% | 1.07% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XRLV vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRLV | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.15% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.67% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility
XRLV vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XRLV | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.70% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 8.35% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 8.35% | — |